Down with Keir Starmer & Consorts, Part 2: Starmer’s Current Alliances
In part 1 I examined Starmer’s shady past. In this installment, I will take a look at Starmer’s current alliances which are consistent with those in his past.
(Part 1. Part 3. Part 4. Part 5. Part 6. Part 7. Part 8. Part 9. The missing links will be added gradually)
An election victory despite/because of it all
Keir Starmer won the Labour leadership race on April 4, 2020, both despite as well as because of his shady past (see part 1): He won the race despite his shady past since, as usual, a) vast parts of the voting public were unaware or insufficiently aware of it and since b) media propagandists who work for Starmer & Co such as Paul Mason
had been spreading outrageously stupid falsehoods about both Starmer and his main pro-Corbyn opponent Rebecca Long-Bailey:
Starmer also won the Labour leadership race because of his shady past since the powerful forces that he secretly supported were in turn secretly supporting him, for instance via the undisclosed campaign contributions that I reported on under section 5 of part 1.
One could also make a case that, despite the largely preventable Coronavirus crisis in the UK (see my article) that also contributed to the following results, Corbyn had a bigger mandate than the milquetoast Starmer since Corbyn won in 2015
a) in a field of 4 final contenders (as opposed to 3),
b) with 59.5% vs. 19% vs. 17% vs. 4.5% of the vote (as opposed to Starmer’s 56.2% vs. 26.7% vs. 16.2%),
c) with a 40.5 percentage point difference compared to the runner-up (as opposed to Starmer’s 29.5 percentage point difference)
d) and with 76% voter turnout (as opposed to 63%).
Starmer’s allies
Aside from 1) mainstream media and 2) Conservatives as (more) obvious political opponents and servants of the 1%, Corbyn, his progressive allies and their political pro-99% project also got undermined by 3) right-wing zionist hate groups, Israeli front organisations and propaganda outlets (LFI, JLM, BoD, CAA, etc.; Jewish Chronicle, Jewish News, etc.; two notable exceptions are the Jewish Voice for Peace and the Jewish Voice for Labour) and also by 4) oftentimes affiliated right-wing Labour party members and saboteurs. All of these four to some extent overlapping groups are guided by anti-99% and pro-1% motives.
If we now take a look at Starmer’s allies and collaborateurs since he assumed power in Labour on April 4, it is glaringly obvious that all of these anti-99% and pro-1% groups are much happier with Starmer than with Corbyn which is once again extremely telling with regard to where Starmer’s actual allegiances lie.
Starmer and the right-wing, hateful and lying radical Zionists
Pretty much the first thing that Starmer did after becoming Labour ‘leader’ is to swear fealty to his right-wing zionist overlords and other handlers in the 1% and to promise them that any pro-99% progressives and leftists would be hunted down further in the still ongoing anti-Semitism (AS) witchhunt against them:
Starmer might as well have raised his right hand and proclaimed “Bibi/Israel command, we follow you!”:
As a logical follow-up, the right-wing Zionist hate and propaganda group CAA immediately called for the ouster of Jeremy Corbyn:
Wannabe ‘leaders’ grovelling before the Israel lobby
To be fair to Starmer, it was and is not just him but also all the other (back then) three wannabe ‘leaders’ Rebecca Long-Bailey, Lisa Nandy and LFI member Emily Thornberry which dutyfully grovelled before the right-wing and racist Israel lobby at a JLM/LFI/Jewish News organised Labour ‘leadership’ hustings. To add insult to injury, that hustings was moderated by Robert Peston, a right-wing presstitute and Boris Johnson ass-kisser and boot-licker:
As for what the Labour non-leadership candidates who all made utter jokes of themselves by even attending that humiliation-fest actually said:
All hopefuls were asked if they considered themselves zionists at the event last night.
Lisa Nandy — who received JLM’s formal backing today after winning 50.9 per cent of a vote by the membership — said: “I believe that Jewish people have the right to national self-determination. That makes me a zionist.”
Emily Thornberry said: “I believe in the state of Israel and therefore I’m a zionist.”
Sir Keir Starmer said: “I don’t describe myself as a zionist but I understand, sympathise and support zionism.”
Rebecca Long-Bailey said: “I agree with a secure Israel alongside a viable Palestinian state … I suppose that makes me a zionist because I agree with Israel’s right to exist and right to self determine.”
As for how that amounts to grovelling before the foreign power of Israel, I will let a JVL member explain:
Jewish Voice for Labour (JVL) co-chair Leah Levane told the Star that criticism of Israel has been conflated with “anti-semitism.”
She added: “Candidates clearly knew that if they admitted to doubts about zionism there was likely to be a wholesale onslaught accusing them of being apologists for anti-semitism or worse.”
She stressed that it is possible and “extremely common” to criticise Israel without “harbouring prejudice, hostility or hatred towards Jews.”
Protests from Jewish Labour voters
There are plenty of Jewish Labour voters and sympathizers who are disgusted by that sick spectactle of Labour prostating itself before hostile powers and organisations that do not represent them or their values. To them, the JLM, BoD etc. are nothing but crazy, racist, right-wing fringe groups:
And from a Tweeter who recently appears to have closed down their account and who I will let remain anonymous:
“HERE IS KEIR. BOWING TO THE BOD. NOT. IN. MY. JEWISH. NAME. EVER!!!!!!!!!”
Two Zionist propaganda channels go bankrupt
On the plus side, at least two of the despicable propaganda outlets that contributed to the AS-smear campaign against Corbyn and progressives — The Jewish Chronicle and the The Jewish News — went broke recently, but unfortunately not before succeeding in helping to smear Corbyn away. Jewish people were also among their targets, which once again helps to explain and to understand against whom or what these propaganda were actually working:
Of course, the sycophantic Guardian which likes to depict itself as progressive but which is firmly under the control of the establishment and the Israel lobby cannot help itself in pretending that the disappearance of two right-wing and anti-progressive propaganda outlets is somehow a loss for the 99%:
The above is rather reminscent of organised and ordered mass crying events in North Korea when the ‘beloved leader’ Kim Il-sung died in 1994 and when the powers that be instilled or tried to instill in the masses the kind of emotions that they thought were appropriate for the latter to have, along the lines of “you better cry now, or else”(the following is actually great fun to watch due to its crazy levels of unintentional irony):
Starmer and the Tories
Another strange or rather highly suspicious and worrying fact is how well Starmer and the Tories are getting along with each other. I will let the evidence speak for itself:
Double-standards about anti-Semitism
What is also highly noticeable is how, when the context changes from Labour to Tories, anti-Semitism is no longer seen as problematic, almost as if this whole great anti-Semitism crisis was never about anti-Semitism in the first place:
If the above cartoon had appeared in a Labour-affiliated context, the usual suspects would be quick to condemn this as AS. But since the above happened in a Conservative context, it is all ok — it is after all progressives like Corbyn and not useful idiots for the 1% such the Conservatives or Starmer which are the problem for the 1% and for which AS is reserved as a political weapon.
Coronavirus: Soft-pedalling on the Tories
Another context in which Starmer’s love affair with the Tories comes to light is the Coronavirus crisis. In this respect, Starmer is just as useless as the Tories since he promised the NHS staff who are dying on the front lines (hold your breath and imagine drumrolls)… medals! The replies were accordingly:
I also reported earlier on how Boris Johnson and the Tories in general are basically mass killers of UK citizens through their abhorrent and criminal neglect in properly dealing with the Coronavirus. As a result of that criminal neglect, the UK now has a higher daily death toll than China ever had(!), higher than Italy, by now perhaps even the highest in Europe and people are literally tweeting about “#BorisTheButcher”:
But is that a cause of concern or anger for Starmer? No, of course not:
Starmer from that article:
On this lack of PPE: “The Health Secretary said on Friday that there was enough equipment, the frontline says otherwise. There’s a mismatch and that’s the sort of thing that parliament needs to pursue… we need accountability in this.”
Asked if the government should apologise: “It would be smart of the government to acknowledge that their ambition for the equipment to be where it should be… isn’t being matched and probably just to apologise for that.”
But he added: “I’m trying to resist calls for apologies or criticising past decisions. What we need is: what’s the problem, where are the real issues, and what can we do to fix it?”
This is a clear “open-and-shut case” against the Tory regime. Yet Starmer dithers as if there were some remaining uncertainty about who to believe about the ‘mismatch’ between what the Tory scum and the frontline health workers who are sick and dying are telling us about missing protective gear! See here for a clear instance of Tory scum blaming its victims:
But it gets even more absurd:
On what he is changing about Labour as leader: “The first thing I did was to be absolutely clear about things like antisemitism. And that’s why I issued an apology in my acceptance speech, the first opportunity that I had, to our Jewish communities.”
So on the one hand, the UK is set for tens and probably hundreds of thousands of preventable Coronavirus deaths due to the Tory regime, but Starmer is “trying to resist calls for apologies or criticising past decisions.” On the other hand, Starmers issued an apology because of a non-existent AS-crisis that was manufactured by the enemies of Corbyn and progressives — including by Starmer himself — and in which pretty much the only people who died were the few who killed themselves due to being subjected to such a slanderous bullying (I personally witnessed another case on Twitter in which a self-described socialist and Corbynite fortunately did not follow through after announcing that they would kill themselves after being bullied and after receiving some help):
If those are not completely messed up priorities on the side of Starmer, then I don’t know what is.
Starmer and the Blairites
Being the complete traitor and tool for the 1% that he is, Starmer of course also brought and is planning to bring additional filthy good-for-nothing Blairites back:
Summary of Part 2
But I will talk about that more in part 3 in the context of Starmer’s Shadow Cabinet of Horrors, so onward to a conclusive summary:
The picture is perfectly clear and consistent: Starmer is an installed and useful idiot for the degenerate 1% and allied with all the four aforementioned groups and enemies of Labour and the 99% (MSM, Tories, radical Zionists, Labour party saboteurs):
