Down with Keir Starmer & Consorts, Part 4: The Leaked 860-Page Report and Starmer’s Revealing Reactions
After part 2 I wanted to proceed in chronological order and onward to Starmer’s Shadow Cabinet picks that have also made Labour members quit already. The hottest issue right now is the leaked 860-page report though and how Starmer & Consorts are trying to cover it up. As such, I will move on straight to that and get back to part 3 and the Shadow Cabinet at a later point.
(Part 1. Part 2. Part 3. Part 5. Part 6. Part 7. Part 8. Part 9. The missing links will be added gradually)
The Leaked Report (#LabourReport, #LabourLeak, #LabourLeaks)
Not too long ago and as reported in part 2, Sir Keir of the Conspirators’ Table was still harping on about how Corbyn and progressives should apologize for a non-existent Labour anti-Semitism crisis (not very surprisingly, this pro-Starmer trash from February 13, 2020, was printed in the Guardian):
Starmer went even further:
Keir Starmer has criticised Labour under Jeremy Corbyn for “turning on its staff” who blew the whistle about antisemitism, joining all the leadership contenders in saying the former officials should receive an apology and financial settlement.
Labour gave a truthful response:
In response, Labour criticised the programme as biased and released a statement saying: “It appears these disaffected former officials include those who have always opposed Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, worked to actively undermine it and have both personal and political axes to grind. This throws into doubt their credibility as sources.”
The saboteurs replied with even more lies and sabotage:
Two of the former officials, Sam Matthews and Louise Withers-Green, later decided to take legal action against the party for libel.
Speaking at a hustings hosted by the Jewish Labour Movement, Starmer said: “I remember that programme well and being shocked by the response that was put out … I remember what I said to Jeremy. I said I’ve never been in an organisation that turns on its staff before, ever. Because what message do you think that sends not just to the ex-staff but current staff who speak out. They will be branded disloyal. I think it was utterly wrong that statement was put out and I said that directly the next morning.”
So far, this leaves doubt about who the guilty party actually is.
Unfortunately for the AS-smearers though, we all received a very beautiful and bountiful easter egg in the form of a leaked 860-page report which reveals beyond the shadow of any doubt that the above officials were the perpetrators and that progressive Corbyn Labour was and continues to be their victims:
Sky News reported on what became known as the #LabourReport or #LabourLeak on April 11
On April 12, the antisemitism report was circulating on Twitter after ever more follow-up leaks, and more and more people got their hands on it:
First Reactions
Starmer & Consorts
Two days later on April 13, Starmer still did not say a peep about the report. Given the gravity of the situation for traitors like Starmer who must have been in heated phonecalls or backroom discussions about how to minimize the damage for them, this is only understandable:
Once they did start to act later that day, they did so by “overriding party democracy.” A “great start” indeed:
The Lying and Distorting MSM
The MSM were of course in on it:
Mark Curtis connects the dots:
A collaboration between Labour saboteurs and MSM
In other words: There was and continues to be an indubitable collaboration between the Labour saboteurs such as Starmer and the lying MSM:
As also pointed out by the editor-in-chief of the excellent progressive medium The Canary:
First Reports by The Guardian and The Independent
The Guardian’s report on the leaks
The Guardian published a first report on the leaks on April 12:
Owen Jones’ pride is not entirely warranted though, because the reason for why Sky published before the Guardian is that, very tellingly, the Guardian initially refused to publish anything on the leak:
Given that context, we cannot expect all that much from the Guardian’s indeed guarded report. The Guardian is pretending to do some reporting on the leak for a little bit:
The report said it might not seem immediately clear why this is relevant but “many staff, including GLU [governance and legal unit] staff and senior staff with responsibility for managing and overseeing GLU, were bitterly opposed to the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, and seem to have been demotivated, or largely interested in work that could advance a factional agenda”.
It said: “At its extreme, some employees seem to have taken a view that the worse things got for Labour the happier they would be, since this might expedite Jeremy Corbyn’s departure from office.
Mainly though, that ‘report’ leaves out all the juicy bits and does not really reveal much or anything beyond what we already knew from Sky on April 11. Instead, that ‘report’ rather blankets out just how bad the situation is by only giving some less jarring general information before ending on pro-Starmer and AS-crisis propaganda:
After a video meeting, he said: “It was very important to me to seek to address the disgrace of antisemitism in our party as soon as possible. Today, I repeated once again the apology I made as soon as I was elected leader. Over the last few years, we have failed the Jewish community on antisemitism.”
Given the Guardian’s degeneracy in, for instance, reporting on the imprisoned journalist Julian Assange, that sickening behaviour does not really come as a surprise for media insiders since it is consistent with earlier sickening behaviour:
The Independent’s report on the leaks
The Independent’s report is significantly better than the Guardian’s trash piece, mainly because it does not spare the reader from a wide range of sordid details such as the following:
There are still a few oversights in that report, such as still taking the rabid nutters from the CAA seriously:
[T]he Campaign Against Antisemitism said the document was a “desperate last-ditch attempt to deflect and discredit allegations” and amounted to “an attempt to imagine a vast anti-Corbyn conspiracy”.
Overall though and contrary to the effective Guardian cover up story, the Independent’s report delivers many juicy bits such as the following which is why it is a significantly better report than the Guardian’s and a good and even explosive report in general:
In one exchange a senior official said a young activist had “mental health issues”, to which another official chimed in: “I hope [name of activist redacted] dies in a fire.” A third said: “That’s a very bad wish [name redacted]. But if he does I wouldn’t piss on him to put him out.” The second official then adds: “Wish there was a petrol can emoji.”
Starmer’s three-pronged counter-strategy
…against the leak is pretty obvious: 1) Suppress what still can be suppressed, and 2) trying to put a for the perpetrators beneficial spin on the huge revelations that have come out.
An additional third strategy of Starmer & Consorts is 3) trying to drag things out for as long as possible in order to a) buy themselves more time, b) consolidate their power and while also c) hoping that people will forget about or de-prioritize these gigantic revelations especially in the middle of a Coronavirus crisis and pandemic.
Suppression — and much earlier than expected
Reports came out on April 11 that Starmer-associated lawyers refused to release the report, thereby creating the initial impression that Starmer’s suppression of the report only began that day when it was leaked.
But that is not true, because Starmer was holding back that explosive report since April 4:
The SKWAWKBOX can also confirm that Starmer received a copy of the report almost as soon as his election as leader was announced. However, no action was taken until the report was leaked.
The fact that Starmer has been quietly sitting on this explosive report for a whole week raises many eyebrows and questions. It also tells us once again in no uncertain terms what an utterly duplicitous piece of shit Starmer actually is:
Blaming the messenger
As the main part of Starmer & Consorts’ second counter-strategy of trying to put a spin on the leak we see that they are using the well-known tactic of blaming/killing/shooting the messenger that was also used against the journalist and leaker Julian Assange:
A Starmer parody/truth-speaking account chimes in:
Some centrist retards do so too, but in their case the parody is unintentional, self-directed and ultimately Orwellian:
A translation of Starmer’s complete bullshit reply
On April 13, Starmer & Consorts issued the following bullshit public statement on the explosive and for them very dangerous leaked report:
Interestingly, even the term of “commission” is already bullshit since Starmer is rather under a “legal duty or obligation” in this respect:
Fortunately for everyone involved, I have actually studied translation in my early 20s and will now use those skills for a somewhat humorous but mostly serious translation from Starmerish into English:
“urgent independent investigation”
Translation: “drawn-out joke of a pretense of an investigation that will be conducted by our cronies so that we can get the results that we want.”
As far as the main text is concerned:
“We have seen a copy of an apparently internal report about the work of the Labour Party’s governance and legal unit in relation to antisemitism. The content and the release of the report into the public domain raise a number of matters of serious concern.
Translation: “We got caught, fuck!!!”
“We will therefore commission an urgent independent investigation into this matter. This investigation will be instructed to look at three areas. First, the background and circumstances in which the report was commissioned and the process involved.
Translation: “Who were the fuckers who leaked this?!”
“Second, the contents and wider culture and practices referred to in the report.
Translation: “Even though we sabotaged Corbyn and progressives for years, let’s pretend that we are totally surprised and puzzled by these revelations.”
Third, the circumstances in which the report was put into the public domain.
Translation: “How did those fuckers leak this?!”
“We have also asked for immediate sight of any legal advice the Labour Party has already received about the report.
Translation: “We are trying to take legal action against the fuckers who leaked this if/when we find them.”
“In the meantime, we ask everyone concerned to refrain from drawing conclusions before the investigation is complete and we will be asking the general secretary to put measures in place to protect the welfare of party members and party staff who are concerned or affected by this report.”
Translation: “In the meantime, don’t think for yourself. It is 100% certain and out in the open now that we sabotaged you for years, that we made Labour lose and the Tories win in 2017; that we gave you the May regime, the Johnson regime and the Coronavirus crisis and tens and hundreds of thousands of preventable Covid-19 deaths in 2020. We are really just trying to save our traitorous asses here by pouring propaganda into your minds. Please be dumb enough to swallow this bullshit uncritically. You just gotta believe us contrary to what the evidence screams in your face. Kind regards, Starmer & Consorts”
To make matters even worse, the systematic sabotage of lefties and progressives by degenerate party bureacrats and traitors such as Starmer & Consorts even predates Corbyn:
So much, in any event, for Starmer’s once again exceptionally revealing responses to the leaked Labour report that leave not even a shadow of a doubt that he stands firmly on the side of the saboteurs that prevented a Labour win in the national 2017 elections in which Labour needed only less than 2500 more votes to win:
One thing is certain: The price that traitors such as Starmer should be forced pay for this treachery needs to be devastating.
