Ziofascist Israel Is Nazi Germany 2.0, Part 3—Similarities 11 and 12: Terrorism and Antisemitism
An article in three sections: Similarity 11: Ziofascist Israel Is a Terrorist State Like Nazi Germany (11.1 The July 22, 1946 Ziofascist Terrorist Bombing of the King David Hotel by Irgun and Menachem Begin; 11.2 Yitzhak Shamir’s Racism, Terrorism and Politics; 11.3 The September 17, 1948 Ziofascist Terrorist Assassination of UN Mediator Count Folke Bernadotte by Lehi aka the Stern Gang and Yitzhak Shamir; 11.4 Albert Einstein’s 1948 Ziofascist Terrorist Warnings; 11.5 Ziofascist Israels’ 1950s Anti-Semitic Actions and Terrorism in Yemen, Morocco, Iraq and Egypt (Operation Susannah/Lavon Affair); 11.6 Ziofascist Israeli Terrorism from the 1980s to the Present; 11.7 Ziofascist Israel’s Collective Punishment like the German Nazis’ “Sippenhaft”; 11.8 The Export and Spread of Ziofascist Terrorism).
Similarity 12: Zionism, Ziofascism and Israel Are Antisemitic Like Nazism and Nazi Germany (12.1 The June 30, 1921 Assassination of the Jewish Antizionist Jacob Isräel de Haan in Jerusalem by Ziofascist Haganah Terrorists; 12.2 The Antisemitic Evangelical Christian Roots of Zionism; 12.3 The Zionist Antisemite Theodor Herzl; 12.4 Zionism and Nazi Germany; 12.5 Ziofascist Israel’s Rejection of Poor Jews Who Wanted to Immigrate; 12.6 Ziofascist Israel versus the Jewish Holocaust Survivors Marek Edelman and Rene Lichtman; 12.7 The November 4, 1995 Yitzhak Shamir- and Benjamin Netanyahu-instigated Assassination of the Israeli PM Yitzhak Rabin; 12.8 Ziofascist Israel’s Support for Hamas; 12.9 Ziofascists’ Use of the Antisemitic “Self-hating/wrong kind of/fake Jew” Trope Against Antizionist Jews; 12.10 Ziofascist Israeli Violence Against Israeli Jews; 12.11 Ziofascist Israeli Mistaken Identity Killings of Jews in Israel; 12.12 The Hannibal Directive: When Ziofascist Israel Deliberately Kills Israeli Jews; 12.13 Jews’ Increasing Rejection of Zionism and Israel as Antisemitic, Criminal, Evil, Inhumane and Insane).
Conclusion: Dezion(az)ification.
To once again begin with a few introductory statements that highlight the evident similarities between Ziofascist Israeli and Nazi Germany before moving on to similarities 11 terrorism and 12 Antisemitism:
From a February 10, 2024 headline:
Quotes from the Jewish Israeli polymath Yeshayahu Leibowitz:
Confirmation from today:
Another comparison of the Ziofascist entity to Nazi Germany by a Jewish US political show host:
From a Ziofascist Israeli Jewish shipping billionaire:
Similarity 11: Ziofascist Israel Is a Terrorist State Like Nazi Germany
As pointed out by pro-human rights political commentators and even Pope Francis, there can be no doubt whatsoever that Ziofascist Israel too is a terrorist state just like Nazi Germany back then or the USA today:
Interestingly, the understanding that Zionism or Ziofascism is terrorism and that Ziofascist Israel is or will be a terrorist state goes back to even before the foundation of that terrorist entity on May 14, 1948:
The 1977 book “Jewish-Zionist Terrorism and the Establishment of Israel” also confirms the fundamental role of Ziofascist terrorism in forming Israel:
Confirmation from the 2020s by a French admiral:
The irony:
The following will highlight the connection between Ziofascist terrorists leaders becoming Israeli prime ministers, thereby providing yet more confirmation for the conclusion that Israel is indeed a Nazi Germany-like terrorist state since it rewards Ziofascist terrorists by elevating them to the highest state positions.
11.1 The July 22, 1946 Ziofascist Terrorist Bombing of the King David Hotel by Irgun and Menachem Begin
Menachem Begin (Hebrew: מְנַחֵם בֵּגִין Menaḥem Begin, pronounced [menaˈχem ˈbeɡin] ⓘ; Polish: Menachem Begin (Polish documents, 1931–1937);[1][2] Russian: Менахем Вольфович Бегин, romanized: Menakhem Volfovich Begin; 16 August 1913–9 March 1992) was an Israeli politician, founder of both Herut and Likud and the sixth Prime Minister of Israel.
Before the creation of the state of Israel, he was the leader of the Zionist militant group Irgun, the Revisionist breakaway from the larger Jewish paramilitary organization Haganah. He proclaimed a revolt, on 1 February 1944, against the British mandatory government, which was opposed by the Jewish Agency. As head of the Irgun, he targeted the British in Palestine,[3] with a notable attack being the King David Hotel bombing. […]
[…]
Begin’s government promoted the construction of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Begin authorized the bombing of the Osirak nuclear plant in Iraq and the invasion of Lebanon in 1982 to fight PLO strongholds there, igniting the 1982 Lebanon War. As Israeli military involvement in Lebanon deepened, and the Sabra and Shatila massacre, carried out by Christian Phalangist militia allies of the Israelis, shocked world public opinion,[5] Begin grew increasingly isolated.[6] As IDF forces remained mired in Lebanon and the economy suffered from hyperinflation, the public pressure on Begin mounted. Depressed by the death of his wife Aliza in November 1982, he gradually withdrew from public life, until his resignation in October 1983.
True to the nature of the genocidal Ziofascist Israeli terrorist state, genocidal Ziofascist Israeli terrorists such as Menachim Begin were rewarded for their terrorism by being elected Israeli Prime Minister, together with memorials and plaques for their terrorist activities:
11.2 Yitzhak Shamir’s Racism, Terrorism and Politics
On Shamir’s rightwing extremist anti-Palestinian Ziofascist background and affiliation with Lehi aka the Stern Gang, a terrorist group which split off from the Menachem Begin-affiliated Irgun to fight the British:
What was most remarkable about Yitzhak Shamir’s life was how little his thinking changed from his youthful days as a member of Betar (1929–33), the Zionist brown shirt organization in Poland, where he was born Yitzhak Yezernitzky, to his last days in Israel at age 96.
As a Betari youth he was greatly influenced by its founder, Vladimir Jabotinsky, the founder also of “Gun Zionism” or, more euphemistically, “Revisionist Zionism.”
Jabotinsky’s vision, the same as Zionism founder Theodor Herzl’s, was “a Jewish majority in a Jewish state in the whole of the biblical Land of Israel.” Jabotinsky, however, realized that this had to be accomplished by force, just as European countries established their colonies by force. “This made sense to me,” Shamir wrote commenting on Jabotinsky’s ideas.
In 1939 — four years after he migrated to British Mandate Palestine — Shamir met the chauvinist Avraham Stern, head of the terrorist Stern Gang. According to Stern, “Rights were awarded only to the strong, who are allowed to take them by force if they are not given to them legally.”
The group declared England as the enemy and made advances to Nazi Germany for an alliance. “The establishment of the historic Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis, bound by a treaty with the German Reich” was part of the proposal a Stern representative made in 1941 to the German minister to Beirut. Shamir omitted this episode in his autobiography.
The racism of the group was strong. One member, Uri Greenberg, referred to the Arabs as “the filthiest people in the East.” Such comments were common in the gang. Considering the Arabs, even all non-Jews, as equals was not in their thinking.
On Shamir’s terrorist activities:
Shamir therefore had no trouble in approving the assassination in 1944 of Lord Moyne (Churchill’s friend). Dr. Amitsur Ilan claimed Shamir was the “prime mover” behind the assassination.
Shamir also was one of three terrorists who blew up the King David Hotel in 1946, killing 88. To escape detection, he disguised himself as a rabbi, with a “full black beard, and long kaftan.” He forgot, however, to trim his eyebrows. A street detective recognized the eyebrows under the black felt rabbi’s hat and captured him. Shamir was then imprisoned, escaping after two years. He murdered his own colleague, Eliahu Giladi, because of disagreement.
Even more memorable were Shamir’s involvements in the attack on the small village of Deir Yassin and the murder of Swedish U.N. mediator Count Folke Bernadotte, both in 1948. The Deir Yassin attack occurred five weeks before a single Arab army became a belligerent. The high number of elderly, women and children killed indicated racist wantonness. Among the 280-some dead were 30 infants. “I saw cut off genitalia and women’s crushed stomachs,” reported investigator Zvi Ankori. There were no wounded.
Even though Bernadotte had saved an estimated 30,000 Jews from the gas chambers during World War II, his “crime” was his effort to have Transjordan excluded from Zionist claims. For this he was assassinated.
Such deeds brought world attention to Shamir and his gang. Besides these headliners, Shamir estimated that his group carried out about 300 other “actions,” with himself as participant in 41 of them.
Shamir then moved up from Ziofascist freelance terrorist to Ziofascist state terrorist by joining the Israeli foreign intelligence agency Mossad, eventually becoming its director:
After the war Shamir was at a loss. What to do? He learned that Israel’s secret service Mossad needed men with “special abilities acquired by such formerly ‘wanted’ men as myself,” he wrote. “It changed my life.” Explained Shamir: “I felt at home very soon: I had returned to an atmosphere, behavior, incentives and points of view that were in many ways, familiar to me.” Now all his former activities were done with establishment approval.
As head of Mossad Shamir not only protected Israeli citizens, but also “Jews abroad.” He not only vowed to make “unforgettable object lessons in the reality and reach of the Jewish state,” but claimed a right to interfere in the internal affairs in every other nation state in the world. It seems preposterous. But it is a reality even today. Witness the recent assassinations of law-abiding Iranian scientists — deemed, without trial, of course, to be enemies of Israel.
Israeli historian Benny Morris wrote that as Mossad head Shamir ran mostly “ad hoc operations, usually involving assassinations.” This was the secretive kind of life Shamir loved. I was “a naturally un-talkative man,” he wrote. “I preferred to work behind the scenes.”
Similar to CIA director-turned-US president George H. W. Bush, the Ziofascist terrorist and Mossad director Shamir then became Israeli Prime Minister:
According to Israel Shahak, the late noted Israeli humanist, under Shamir’s premiership (1983–84 and 1986–92) Israel was “governed like a dictatorship.” “Everything happens as he says,” Shahak observed. Shamir was not interested in the budget or the poor. He focused almost exclusively on the military and on foreign affairs, and particularly on Washington, DC.
Colonizing Palestinian lands — the chief cause of the “Arab-Israeli conflict” — was, according to Shamir, “sacred work; it cannot stop; it is the heart of our existence and life.” Giving the Palestinians anything was unacceptable. Talking peace was wasting time.
Accordingly, Shamir turned down George Shultz’s peace plan of 1988 and James Baker’s the following year. During congressional testimony Baker sarcastically told Shamir: “Take this number: (202) 456- 1414. When you’re serious about peace, call us.”
The boon in Shamir’s life was Ronald Reagan. The two established the “joint military political group,” which entwined the U.S. and Israeli military establishments to such an extent that our own sovereignty was, and still is, compromised.
For him Reagan lifted the ban on cluster weapons, which Israel used against the Lebanese. Shamir also got an agreement on duty — free trade — plus $1.7 billion in military aid and $900 million in economic aid.
In addition, wrote Reagan biographer Richard Reeves, “Reagan and Shamir concluded one agreement after another — most secret, some unwritten.” Shamir got so much that his friends back in Israel asked, “Well, where’s the kitchen sink?”
Not surprisingly Shamir continued his racist attitude toward Palestinians into his premiership. At the beginning of the first intifada (uprising) in 1987 he called the Palestinians “grasshoppers.” When asked about it, he repeated it on television, “Yes, grasshoppers; you need to stomp on ’em every once in a while.”
After retiring in 1992 he enjoyed the status of adviser and elder statesman. Of subsequent leaders, he said, “I had encouraged and groomed almost all of them.” He mentioned future Prime Ministers Ehud Olmert and Binyamin Netanyahu in particular.
Indeed, judging by Israel’s current practices and the growing popularity of “transfer,” Yitzhak Shamir not only trained subsequent leaders but converted Avraham Stern’s minority views of the 1940s, including the racist ones, into the views of a majority of Israelis today.
Confirmation from the Wikipedia entry on Lehi:
Lehi (Hebrew pronunciation: [ˈleχi]; Hebrew: לח״י, sometimes abbreviated “LHI”), officially the Fighters for the Freedom of Israel (Hebrew: לוחמי חרות ישראל, romanized: Lohamei Herut Israel) and often known pejoratively as the Stern Gang,[10][11][12][13] was a Zionist paramilitary militant organization founded by Avraham (“Yair”) Stern in Mandatory Palestine.[14][15][16] Its avowed aim was to evict the British authorities from Palestine by use of violence, allowing unrestricted immigration of Jews and the formation of a Jewish state. It was initially called the National Military Organization in Israel,[17] upon being founded in August 1940, but was renamed Lehi one month later.[18] The group referred to its members as terrorists[19] and admitted to having carried out acts of terrorism.[14][20][21]
Lehi split from the Irgun militant group in 1940 in order to continue fighting the British during World War II. It initially sought an alliance with Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany.[22] Believing that Nazi Germany was a lesser enemy of the Jews than Britain, Lehi twice attempted to form an alliance with the Nazis, proposing a Jewish state based on “nationalist and totalitarian principles, and linked to the German Reich by an alliance”.[22][23] […]
In April 1948, Lehi and the Irgun were jointly responsible for the massacre in Deir Yassin of at least 107 Palestinian Arab villagers, including women and children. Lehi assassinated Lord Moyne, British Minister Resident in the Middle East, and made many other attacks on the British in Palestine.[26] On 29 May 1948, the government of Israel, having inducted its activist members into the Israel Defense Forces, formally disbanded Lehi, though some of its members carried out one more terrorist act, the assassination of Folke Bernadotte some months later,[27] an act condemned by Bernadotte’s replacement as mediator, Ralph Bunche.[28] After the assassination, the new Israeli government declared Lehi a terrorist organization, arresting some 200 members and convicting some of the leaders.[29] Just before the first Israeli elections in January 1949, a general amnesty to Lehi members was granted by the government.[29] In 1980, Israel instituted a military decoration, an “award for activity in the struggle for the establishment of Israel”, the Lehi ribbon.[30] Former Lehi leader Yitzhak Shamir became Prime Minister of Israel in 1983.
11.3 The September 17, 1948 Ziofascist Terrorist Assassination of UN Mediator Count Folke Bernadotte by Lehi aka the Stern Gang and Yitzhak Shamir
11.4 Albert Einstein’s 1948 Ziofascist Israeli Terrorist Warnings
There was, for instance, none other than the Jewish Nobel Prize winning physicist Albert Einstein who warned about and wanted to have nothing to do with the Ziofascist terrorists and Judeo-Nazis. On April 10, 1948 — more than a month before Israel’s founding, Einstein for instance wrote the following letter to Shepard Rifkin in which Einstein described the Ziofascists and their organizations as “Terrorist organizations” and “criminal people”:
“Dear Sir
When a real and final catastrophe should befall us in Palestine the first responsible for it would be the British and the second responsible for it the Terrorist organizations build up from our own ranks.
I am not willing to see anybody associated with those misled and criminal people. […]”
In a December 2, 1948 letter to the editor of the New York Times, Einstein and others decried the Ziofascist Irgun terrorist leader Menachem Begin, his “terrorist” Freedom Party and these “Fascist elements in Israel”:
True to Ziofascist Israel’s terrorist character, Begin later became Prime Minister (1977–83) and was responsible for the 1982 Sabra and Shatila massacre — together with then Minister of Defense Ariel Sharon who, coincidentally, also became Prime Minister, thereby once again giving away the terrorist character of that state of genocidal Ziofascist settler-colonizers.
11.5 Ziofascist Israels’ 1950s Anti-Semitic Actions and Terrorism in Yemen, Morocco, Iraq and Egypt (Operation Susannah/Lavon Affair)
To begin with a question by the professional Ziofascist Israeli hasbara propagandist Hen Mazzig:
Two identical answers:
From that 2020 article, beginning with the Zionist expulsion of Yemeni Jews:
Israel’s fabrications about the immigration of Arab Jews to Israel are so outrageous that the country holds a commemoration on 30 November each year. This date just happens to coincide with the ethnic cleansing by Zionist gangs of Palestine, which began on 30 November 1947, a day after the UN General Assembly adopted the Partition Plan. The choice of date seeks to implicate Arab Jews in the conquest of Palestine, when most had no role in it.
[…]
In 1949, the Israeli government was working assiduously with British colonial authorities in Aden and with Yemeni officials to airlift Yemeni Jews to Israel. While the League of Arab States had resolved to ban the emigration of Arab Jews to Israel, Yemen’s imam allowed Jews to leave as early as February 1949, with the help of Zionist emissaries and Israeli bribes to provincial Yemeni rulers, according to prominent Israeli historian Tom Segev’s book: 1949: The First Israelis.
Some provincial rulers asked that at least 2,000 Jews remain, as it was the religious duty of Muslims to protect them, but the Zionist emissary insisted that it was a Jewish religious “commandment” for them to go to the “Land of Israel”. The fact that Israel’s prime minister at the time was David Ben Gurion also suggested to many that Israel “was the kingdom of David,” according to Segev and other sources. Tens of thousands of Jews were urged to leave their homes and travel to Israel.
[…]
Some of the luggage of the departing Jews, including ancient Torah scrolls, jewellery and embroidered garments, which they were encouraged to bring with them, disappeared en route and mysteriously “made their way to antique and souvenir shops in Israel,” according to Segev and other sources.
About 50,000 Yemeni Jews were essentially removed from Yemen by the Israelis in 1949 and 1950 to face institutionalised Ashkenazi discrimination in Israel. This included the abduction of hundreds of Yemeni children from their parents, who were told the children died; the children were then allegedly handed over for adoption to Ashkenazi couples.
On the Zionist expulsion of Moroccan Jews:
Zionists were also active in bringing about the emigration of Morocco’s Jews to Israel. Morocco was under French colonial occupation at the time, so the Jewish Agency had to strike an agreement with the French governor of Morocco to bring about the emigration of Moroccan Jews, who had to face horrific conditions on Israeli ships, according to Segev and other sources. Some of the 100,000 Jews who left, according to the Jewish Agency emissary, had to be virtually “taken aboard the ships by force”.
On the Zionist expulsion of Iraqi Jews:
Meanwhile, the Iraqi government of Nuri al-Said, Britain’s strongman in the Arab east, was maligned by Israeli propaganda that it was persecuting Jews, when in fact these were Israeli fabrications. Zionist agents had been active in Iraq, smuggling Jews through Iran to Israel, which led to the prosecution of a handful of Zionists.
Then, attacks on Iraqi Jews began, including at the Masuda Shemtov synagogue in Baghdad, killing four Jews and wounding around a dozen more. Some Iraqi Jews believed that this was the work of Mossad agents, aiming to scare Jews into leaving the country. Iraqi authorities accused and executed two activists from the Zionist underground.
Amid Israel’s global campaign to pressure Iraq into allowing Jews to leave — which led to Israeli attempts to block a World Bank loan to Iraq, accompanied by American and British pressure — the Iraqi parliament relented and issued a law permitting Jews to leave. Zionist agents in Iraq telegraphed their handler in Tel Aviv: “We are carrying on our usual activity in order to push the law through faster.” Iraq’s 120,000 Jews were thus soon transferred to Israel.
The hasbara propagandist Hen Mazzig again feigns ignorance:
From the Israeli historian Avi Shlaim and Naeim Giladi, two Iraqi Jews:
On the Zionist expulsion of Egyptian Jews from the previous MEE article:
Among Egypt’s relatively small Jewish community, an even smaller number were Ashkenazi (mostly from Alsace and Russia) who arrived since the 1880s. The larger community consisted of Sephardi Jews who arrived during the same period from Turkey, Iraq and Syria, in addition to the tiny community of Karaite Jews. All in all, they numbered fewer than 70,000 people, half of whom did not hold Egyptian nationality.
Zionist activism among the small community of Ashkenazi Jews in Egypt led some to go to Palestine before 1948. However, it was after the establishment of Israel that many of Egypt’s upper-class Jews began to leave to France, not Israel. Nonetheless, the community remained essentially intact until Israel intervened in 1954, recruiting Egyptian Jews for an Israeli terrorist cell that placed bombs in Egyptian cinemas, the Cairo train station as well as American and British educational institutions and libraries.
The Israelis hoped that by targeting western interests in Egypt, they could sour the then-friendly relations between Egypt’s president and the Americans.
Egyptian intelligence uncovered the Israeli terrorist ring and tried the accused in open court. The Israelis mounted an international campaign against Egypt and president Gamal Abdel Nasser, who was dubbed “Hitler on the Nile” by the Israeli and western press, while Israeli agents shot at the Egyptian consulate in New York, according to David Hirst’s book The Gun and the Olive Branch and other sources.
Combined with the new socialist and nationalist campaign of Egyptianising investments in the country, many rich businessmen began to sell their businesses and leave.
By the time nationalisation began in the late 1950s and early 1960s, most of the nationalised businesses were in fact owned by Egyptian Muslims and Christians, not Jews. It was in this context, and in the context of public rage against Israel, that many Egyptian Jews got scared and left after 1954 to the US and France, while the poor ended up in Israel (as recounted in Joel Beinin’s Dispersion of Egyptian Jewry).
When Israel joined the British-French conspiracy to invade Egypt in 1956, and after its military occupation of the Sinai Peninsula, public rage ensued against the settler-colony. The Egyptian government detained about 1,000 Jews, half of whom were Egyptian citizens, according to Beinin, and Egypt’s small Jewish community began to leave in droves. On the eve of Israel’s second invasion of Egypt in 1967, only 7,000 Jews remained in the country.
The 1954 Lavon Affair:
11.6 Ziofascist Israeli Terrorism from the 1980s to the Present
The first wave of Ziofascist Israeli terrorists passed on the baton to their children and the next generation:
A brief overview over the Sabra and Shatila massacre that was perpetrated with support by the IDF:
The Sabra and Shatila[a] massacre was the 16–18 September 1982 killing of between 1,300 and 3,500 civilians — mostly Palestinians and Lebanese Shias — in the city of Beirut during the Lebanese Civil War. It was perpetrated by the Lebanese Forces, one of the main Christian militias in Lebanon, and supported by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) that had surrounded Beirut’s Sabra neighbourhood and the adjacent Shatila refugee camp.[2]
In June 1982, Israel invaded Lebanon with the intention of rooting out the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). By 30 August 1982, under the supervision of the Multinational Force, the PLO withdrew from Lebanon following weeks of battles in West Beirut and shortly before the massacre took place. Various forces — Israeli, Lebanese Forces and possibly also the South Lebanon Army (SLA) — were in the vicinity of Sabra and Shatila at the time of the slaughter, taking advantage of the fact that the Multinational Force had removed barracks and mines that had encircled Beirut’s predominantly Muslim neighborhoods and kept the Israelis at bay during the siege of Beirut.[3] The Israeli advance over West Beirut in the wake of the PLO withdrawal, which enabled the Lebanese Forces raid, was in violation of the ceasefire agreement between the various forces.[4]
From an October 1, 2012 speech by Miko Peled in Seattle and many Ziofascist Israeli massacres later:
Miko Peled: “[…] and then you’ve got the Israeli army which I like to refer to as one of the most… best trained, best equipped, best fed terrorist organizations in the world.”
Confirmation from Omar Baddar in 2023 and again many Ziofascist Israeli massacres later:
Omar Baddar: “The single biggest terrorist organisation in all of Palestine and Israel is known as the Israeli government. And the military wing of this terrorist organisation which is Orwellianly named the Defense Forces of Israel has engaged in massive war crimes for decade after decade against Palestinians, engaging in the mass killing of Palestinian civilians, and land theft, and denial of water — I mean just the list of atrocities goes on and on and on.
And if we want to just go by a timeline, a question might be: Why did the terrorist government of Israel think it can impose decade after decade of occupation and siege on Palestinians, and deny them any prospect for a better future, and not think that there is going to be a reaction of sorts.
So we have this a little bit backwards: We have this arbitrary starting point of an attack by Hamas […]. But ultimately, we are talking about a situation in which Israel is initiating violence, in which Israeli terrorism dwarfs anything that Hamas has ever done. And we are watching that expand to an even more monstrous scale. Now we are talking about an apartheid government that is engaging, literally, in the mass starvationg of a civilian population and mass terrorism, killing them by the tens of thousands, and the question is ‘Has it gone too far.’ I shudder to live in a world where that is even a question.”
Israel thus turned out to be exactly the kind of Ziofascist terrorist state that the Jewish Albert Einstein had already warned about in 1948:
Of course it is also the USA, Ziofascist Israel’s big sponsor, which qualifies as a terrorist state:
On Ziofascist Israel-sponsored terrorism in Assad’s Syria which just so happens to be within the outlines of a Greater Israel:
Western and Ziofascist propaganda about terrorism and a clarification by the Jewish Antizionist intellectual Noam Chomsky:
Noam Chomsky: “It’s very simple: If they do it, it’s terrorism, if we do it, it’s counterterrorism. That’s a historical universal.
Go back to Nazi propaganda, say, the most extreme mass murderers ever. If you look at Nazi propaganda, that’s exactly what they said. They said they are defending the populations and the legitimate governments of Europe.”
A classic example for Ziofascist propaganda which intends to create the false impression of an ‘antisemitism’ crisis and which deliberately misattributes the Ziofascists’ own terrorism to others:
Overall:
11.7 Ziofascist Israel’s Collective Punishment like the German Nazis’ “Sippenhaft”
Like Nazi Germany and their “Sippenhaft(ung),”
Sippenhaft or Sippenhaftung (German: [ˈzɪpənˌhaft(ʊŋ)], kin liability) is a German term for the idea that a family or clan shares the responsibility for a crime or act committed by one of its members, justifying collective punishment.[1][2] As a legal principle, it was derived from Germanic law in the Middle Ages, usually in the form of fines and compensations. It was adopted by Nazi Germany to justify the punishment of kin (relatives, spouse) for the offence of a family member. Punishment often involved imprisonment and execution, and was applied to relatives of the conspirators of the failed 1944 bomb plot to assassinate Hitler.
…Ziofascist Israel also practices collective punishment as part of their genocidal settler-colonizer terrorist activities against native Palestinians:
A comparison:
From the Jewish Antizionist lawyer Stanley Cohen:
Stanley Cohen: […] if you engage in collective punishment — whether it’s denial of food, medicine, ah, destruction of infrastructure, or whether it’s dropping randomly phosporous bombs and cluster bombs on two and a half million people — that’s a war crime.
[…] under no definition of international law can a cluster bomb, can a phosporous bomb, can indiscriminate tank fire, can attacking boats that are sailing or NGOs that are coming to bring humanitarian aid, or going after hospitals, or going after schools, or going after physicians — under no definition of international law is that lawful […]
From the famous Jewish Israeli historian Ilan Pappé:
Ilan Pappé: “[…] the retaliation is part of something bigger. If I throw a stone — even if I stab you — , and I come from a village, you cannot punish the whole village […].
The collective punishment serves something deeper: I’m here, I’m powerful, I can fuck you all in the village.
You don’t destroy a whole neighborhood in America because there is a gang there that robbed the bank and killed the, I don’t know, killed even innocent civilians. You don’t use F-16 to bomb that neighbourhood. […]
The Dahiya doctrine […] making them suffer in such a way that they will not do it again.
Ziofascist Israel’s collective punishment is so obvious that even a Zionist Piers Morgan gets it:
11.8 The Export and Spread of Ziofascist Terrorism
The West: ‘It’s not terrorism when Jews, Israelis and/or Zionists do it’:
The irony — as per the Ziofascists’ systematically applied DARVO propaganda tactic of “deny, attack, reverse victim and offender” — is that these Ziofascist terrorist will accuse others of being the terrorists:
Note furthermore that “Am Yisrael Chai” — literally “The people of Israel live” — is now the genocidal Ziofascist terrorists’ way of saying “Sieg Heil,” the greeting of Nazi Germany:
Similarity 12: Zionism, Ziofascism and Israel Are Antisemitic like Nazism and Nazi Germany
As already outlined in section 11.5, Ziofascist and Judeo-Nazi terrorism was and is not only directed against the former British colony administrators and moreso the Palestinians, but also against Antizionist Jews and even just Israeli Jews, together with many other Antisemitic attitudes and acts.
As per the definition of “Semite”
Semitic people or Semites is a term for an ethnic, cultural or racial group[2][3][4][5] associated with people of the Middle East, including Arabs, Jews, Akkadians, and Phoenicians.
“Antisemitism” should equally be understood as Antiarab and Antipalestinian as well as Antijewish, but in the following, it will mainly refer to the latter sense of the term.
The June 30, 1921 Assassination of the Jewish Antizionist Jacob Isräel de Haan in Jerusalem by Ziofascist Haganah Terrorists
A perfect example of the overlap between Ziofascist terrorism and Antisemitism is provided by the following assassination which already foreshadows the terrorist and Antisemitic character of the settler-colonizer state that would be created by such Ziofascists:
Shortly before leaving for London,[11] De Haan was assassinated in Jerusalem by the Haganah on the early morning of 30 June 1924.[13] As he exited the synagogue at the Shaare Zedek Hospital on Jaffa Road, Avraham Tehomi approached him and asked for the time. Tehomi shot him three times and ran away from the scene. De Haan died minutes later.[14][12]
At first, the Palestinian Jewish society, the Yishuv, readily accepted the theory that the assassination had to be blamed on Arabs. They did not doubt the Zionist leadership’s assurances that it had played no part in it.[11] With time doubts started rising.
In 1952, Yosef Hecht, the first commander of the main Jewish pre-state self-defense organisation, the Haganah, told the official Haganah historian in a testimony what had actually occurred.[11] In order to stop De Haan’s planned anti-Zionist activity in London, Hecht discussed the issue with Zechariah Urieli, the Haganah commander in Jerusalem. They decided to assassinate De Haan.[11] Two Haganah members, Avraham Tehomi and Avraham Krichevsky, were selected for the task.[11] Hecht did not inform the Yishuv’s civilian leadership until after the assassination, when he contacted Yitzhak Ben-Zvi, a senior member of the National Council.[11] Hecht stated that “he did not regret it and would do it again.”[11] Before the facts were published, journalist Liel Leibovitz wrote that, while the identity of exactly who ordered the assassination was unknown, “there’s little doubt that many in the senior Zionist leadership in Jerusalem knew about the proposal to kill de Haan — and that none objected.”
12.2 The Antisemitic Evangelical Christian Roots of Zionism
As pointed out by the Jewish historian Ilan Pappé about the origins of all that Zionist insanity:
Ilan Pappé: “Zionism began as a project of evangelical Christianity, long before Jewish intellectuals suggested the idea of creating a Jewish state in Palestine, and the motivation was antisemitic. In the vision of evangelical Christianity, you could not have the end of time, the resurrection of the dead, the return of the Messiah, without the return of the Jews to Palestine. But it created a good pretext to encourage the idea that the Jews should not live either in the United States or in Europe.
So I used to call it the double-bill for Antisemites, because they get rid of the Jews and, so to speak, they get back the only Jew they want, which is Jesus Christ.
This kind of group was very important among the British policy makers. Lord Balfour, who is behind the Balfour Declaration, was a very [well-]known Antisemite. His greatest worry was that Antisemitism in Russia would push hundreds of thousands of thousands of Jews into Britain. So he legislated, in 1906, the Aliens Act in the British Parliament, that was specifically meant to disallow refugees from Russia to come to Britain. Not surprisingly, when he began his connection with the Zionist movement, he saw an even a better solution than trying, by force, to prevent Jews from Eastern Europe to come to Britain. It was better to reorientate them to Palestine.
On top of it, he was told by British imperialist strategies that a Jewish Palestine would justify the integration or the incorporation of Palestine within the British Empire.
Later documents confirm that the ‘Jewish’ or rather the Ziofascist state of Israel was indeed intended to be little but an outpost for and dependency of the Anglo Empire and that Britain’s support for it had nothing to do with wanting to “save the Jews”:
More confirmation of the Antisemitic roots of Zionism:
On Edwin Montagu and his respective 1917 memorandum titled “The Anti-Semitism of the Present Government”:
Edwin Samuel Montagu PC (6 February 1879–15 November 1924) was a British Liberal politician who served as Secretary of State for India between 1917 and 1922. Montagu was a “radical” Liberal[1] and the third practising Jew (after Sir Herbert Samuel and Sir Rufus Isaacs) to serve in the British cabinet.
[…]
Montagu was elected Member of Parliament for Chesterton in 1906, a seat he held until 1918, and then represented Cambridgeshire until 1922. He served under H. H. Asquith as Under-Secretary of State for India from 1910 to 1914, as Financial Secretary to the Treasury from 1914 to 1915 and again from 1915 to 1916 and as Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (with a seat in the Cabinet) in 1915 and 1916. In 1915 he was sworn of the Privy Council. In 1916 he was promoted to Minister of Munitions.
I have chosen the above title for this memorandum, not in any hostile sense, not by any means as quarrelling with an anti-Semitic view which may be held by my colleagues, not with a desire to deny that anti-Semitism can be held by rational men, not even with a view to suggesting that the Government is deliberately anti-Semitic; but I wish to place on record my view that the policy of His Majesty’s Government is anti-Semitic in result will prove a rallying ground for Anti-Semites in every country in the world.
This view is prompted by the receipt yesterday of a correspondence between Lord Rothschild and Mr. Balfour.
Lord Rothschild’s letter is dated the 18th July and Mr. Balfour’s answer is to be dated August 1917. I fear that my protest comes too late, and it may well be that the Government were practically committed when Lord Rothschild wrote and before I became a member of the Government, for there has obviously been some correspondence or conversation before this letter. But I do feel that as the one Jewish Minister in the Government I may be allowed by my colleagues an opportunity of expressing views which may be peculiar to myself, but which I hold very strongly and which I must ask permission to express when opportunity affords.
[…]
Zionism has always seemed to me to be a mischievous political creed, untenable by any patriotic citizen of the United Kingdom. If a Jewish Englishman sets his eyes on The Mount of Olives and longs for the day when he will shake British soil from his shoes and go back to agricultural pursuits in Palestine, he has always seemed to me to have acknowledged aims inconsistent with British citizenship and to have admitted that he is unfit for a share in public life in Great Britain, or to be treated as an Englishman. I have always understood that those who indulged in this creed were largely animated by the restrictions upon and refusal of liberty to Jews in Russia. But at the very time when these Jews have been acknowledged as Jewish Russians and given all liberties, it seems to be inconceivable that Zionism should be officially recognised by the British Government, and that Mr. Balfour should be authorized to say that Palestine was to be reconstituted as the “national home of the Jewish people”. I do not know what this involves, but I assume that it means that Mahommedans and Christians are to make way for the Jews and that the Jews should be put in all positions of preference and should be peculiarly associated with Palestine in the same way that England is with the English or France with the French, that Turks and other Mahommedans in Palestine will be regarded as foreigners, just in the same way as Jews will hereafter be treated as foreigners in every country but Palestine. Perhaps also citizenship must be granted only as a result of a religious test.
I lay down with emphasis four principles:
1. I assert that there is not a Jewish nation. The members of my family, for instance, who have been in this country for generations, have no sort or kind of community of view or of desire with any Jewish family in any other country beyond the fact that they profess to a greater or less degree the same religion. It is no more true to say that a Jewish Englishman and a Jewish Moor are of the same nation than it is to say that a Christian Englishman and a Christian Frenchman are of the same nation: of the same race, perhaps, traced back through the centuries — through centuries of the history of a peculiarly adaptable race. The Prime Minister and M. Briand are, I suppose, related through the ages, one as a Welshman and the other as a Breton, but they certainly do not belong to the same nation.
2. When the Jews are told that Palestine is their national home, every country will immediately desire to get rid of its Jewish citizens, and you will find a population in Palestine driving out its present inhabitants, taking all the best in the country, drawn from all quarters of the globe, speaking every language on the face of the earth, and incapable of communicating with one another except by means of an interpreter. I have always understood that this was the consequence of the building of the Tower of Babel, if ever it was built, and I certainly do not dissent from the view, commonly held, as I have always understood, by the Jews before Zionism was invented, that to bring the Jews back to form a nation in the country from which they were dispersed would require Divine leadership. I have never heard it suggested, even by their most fervent admirers, that either Mr. Balfour or Lord Rothschild would prove to be the Messiah.
I claim that the lives that British Jews have led, that the aims that they have had before them, that the part that they have played in our public life and our public institutions, have entitled them to be regarded, not as British Jews, but as Jewish Britons. I would willingly disfranchise every Zionist. I would be almost tempted to proscribe the Zionist organisation as illegal and against the national interest. But I would ask of a British Government sufficient tolerance to refuse a conclusion which makes aliens and foreigners by implication, if not at once by law, of all their Jewish fellow-citizens.
3. I deny that Palestine is to-day associated with the Jews or properly to be regarded as a fit place for them to live in. The Ten Commandments were delivered to the Jews on Sinai. It is quite true that Palestine plays a large part in Jewish history, but so it does in modern Mahommendan history, and, after the time of the Jews, surely it plays a larger part than any other country in Christian history. The Temple may have been in Palestine, but so was the Sermon on the Mount and the Crucifixion. I would not deny to Jews in Palestine equal rights to colonisation with those who profess other religions, but a religious test of citizenship seems to me to be the only admitted by those who take a bigoted and narrow view of one particular epoch of the history of Palestine, and claim for the Jews a position to which they are not entitled.
If my memory serves me right, there are three times as many Jews in the world as could possible get into Palestine if you drove out all the population that remains there now. So that only one-third will get back at the most, and what will happen to the remainder?
4. I can easily understand the editors of the Morning Post and of the New Witness being Zionists, and I am not in the least surprised that the non-Jews of England may welcome this policy. I have always recognised the unpopularity, much greater than some people think, of my community. We have obtained a far greater share of this country’s goods and opportunities than we are numerically entitled to. We reach on the whole maturity earlier, and therefore with people of our own age we compete unfairly. Many of us have been exclusive in our friendships and intolerant in our attitude, and I can easily understand that many a non-Jew in England wants to get rid of us. But just as there is no community of thought and mode of life among Christian Englishmen, so there is not among Jewish Englishmen. More and more we are educated in public schools and at the Universities, and take our part in the politics, in the Army, in the Civil Service, of our country. And I am glad to think that the prejudices against inter-marriage are breaking down. But when the Jew has a national home, surely it follows that the impetus to deprive us of the rights of British citizenship must be enormously increased. Palestine will become the world’s Ghetto. Why should the Russian give the Jew equal rights? His national home is Palestine. Why does Lord Rothschild attach so much importance to the difference between British and foreign Jews? All Jews will be foreign Jews, inhabitants of the great country of Palestine.
I do not know how the fortunate third will be chosen, but the Jew will have the choice, whatever country he belongs to, whatever country he loves, whatever country he regards himself as an integral part of, between going to live with people who are foreigners to him, but to whom his Christian fellow-countrymen have told him he shall belong, and of remaining as an unwelcome guest in the country that he thought he belonged to.
I am not surprised that the Government should take this step after the formation of a Jewish Regiment, and I am waiting to learn that my brother, who has been wounded in the Naval Division, or my nephew, who is in the Grenadier Guards, will be forced by public opinion or by Army regulations to become an officer in a regiment which will mainly be composed of people who will not understand the only language which he speaks — English. I can well understand that when it was decided, and quite rightly, to force foreign Jews in this country to serve in the Army, it was difficult to put them in British regiments because of the language difficulty, but that was because they were foreigners, and not because they were Jews, and a Foreign Legion would seem to me to have been the right thing to establish. A Jewish Legion makes the position of Jews in other regiments more difficult and forces a nationality upon people who have nothing in common.
I feel that the Government are asked to be the instrument for carrying out the wishes of a Zionist organisation largely run, as my information goes, at any rate in the past, by men of enemy descent or birth, and by this means have dealt a severe blow to the liberties, position and opportunities of service of their Jewish fellow-countrymen.
I would say to Lord Rothschild that the Government will be prepared to do everything in their power to obtain for Jews in Palestine complete liberty of settlement and life on an equality with the inhabitants of that country who profess other religious beliefs. I would ask that the Government should go no further.
E.S.M.
23 August 1917
The racist Zionist Antisemite Winston Churchill followed suit with an article in 1920 and confirmed Montagu’s memorandum about “The Anti-Semitism of the Present Government” in which he distinguished between ‘good’ Zionist and ‘bad’ Bolshevist Jews via another classic Antisemitic trope:
Decades later, the evident Antisemitism of “non-Jewish Zionists” in general was also not lost on the great black author and public intellectual James Baldwin who, in a 1979 article in The Nation, likewise noted that Zionists are antisemitic and that Israel is a “Western” (imperialist and hence a genocidal) project:
the Western world […] have no alIies — only business partners, or “satellites” — and have broken every promise you ever made, anywhere, to anyone. I know what I am talking about: my grandfather never got the promised “forty acres, and a mule,” the Indians who survived that holocaust are either on reservations or dying in the streets, and not a single treaty between the United States and the Indian was ever honored. That is quite a record.
Jews and Palestinians know of broken promises. From the time of the Balfour Declaration (during World War I) Palestine was under five British mandates, and England promised the land back and forth to the Arabs or the Jews, depending on which horse seemed to be in the lead. The Zionists — as distinguished from the people known as Jews — using, as someone put it, the “available political machinery,’’ i.e., colonialism, e.g., the British Empire — promised the British that, if the territory were given to them, the British Empire would be safe forever.
But absolutely no one cared about the Jews, and it is worth observing that non-Jewish Zionists are very frequently anti-Semitic. […]
[…]
the state of Israel was not created for the salvation of the Jews; it was created for the salvation of the Western interests. This is what is becoming clear (I must say that it was always clear to me). The Palestinians have been paying for the British colonial policy of “divide and rule” and for Europe’s guilty Christian conscience for more than thirty years.
Finally: there is absolutely — repeat: absolutely — no hope of establishing peace in what Europe so arrogantly calls the Middle East (how in the world would Europe know? having so dismally failed to find a passage to India) without dealing with the Palestinians. The collapse of the Shah of Iran not only revealed the depth of the pious Carter’s concern for “human rights,” it also revealed who supplied oil to Israel, and to whom Israel supplied arms. It happened to be, to spell it out, white South Africa.
12.3 The Zionist Antisemite Theodor Herzl and the Irony of Mount Herzl
The Zionist Theodor Herzl is so venerated by the Ziofascist Israelis that they even named the national cemetary “Mount Herzl” after that Antisemite:
Mount Herzl (Hebrew: הַר הֶרְצְל Har Hertsl), also Har ha-Zikaron (הַר הַזִּכָּרוֹן lit. “Mount of Remembrance”), is the site of Israel’s national cemetery and other memorial and educational facilities, found on the west side of Jerusalem beside the Jerusalem Forest.
It is named after Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism. Herzl’s tomb lies at the top of the hill. Yad Vashem, which commemorates the Holocaust, lies to the west of Mt. Herzl.[!]
[…]
During summer 1949, Theodor Herzl’s remains were reinterred on a hill in West Jerusalem which faced the Mount of Olives from a distance and renamed in his honour, Mount Herzl.[2] In November 1949, soldiers who fell during the 1947–1949 Palestine war in the Jerusalem area were buried on the north slope of the hill.[3]
Apart from Theodor Herzl, Mt. Herzl is the burial place of five of Israel’s prime ministers: Levi Eshkol, Golda Meir, Yitzhak Shamir, Yitzhak Rabin (who is buried beside his wife Leah) and Shimon Peres. Israeli presidents are also buried on Mt. Herzl, as are other prominent Jewish and Zionist leaders.
Mt. Herzl is the venue for many commemorative events and national celebrations.
[…]
To the north of Herzl’s grave is a plot reserved for the leaders of the (World) Zionist Organization, among them David Wolffsohn, Nahum Sokolow, Simcha Dinitz, and Arieh Dulzin. In the same section are the graves and cenotaphs of close relatives of Theodor Herzl.
The grave of Ze’ev Jabotinsky and his family is in a separate plot southwest of Herzl’s grave.
[…]
The main Israel Defense Forces cemetery is located on the northern slope of Mt. Herzl. It was established in November 1949, when soldiers who fell in the Jerusalem area were buried there.[3] In 1949, the government decided to turn the site into the main cemetery for IDF members who have fallen in the line of duty.
Herzl’s Antisemitism was apparent in “Mauschel,” an article published in his weekly Zionist propaganda publication “Die Welt”:
To translate the heavily antisemitic ‘Antizionist Jews are bad Jews’-passages of the first paragraph of Theodor Herzl’s Die Welt article “Mauschel” into English (“Erscheint jeden Freitag” at the top informs us that this antisemitic Zionist propaganda rag was published every Friday):
“Mauschel is an Antizionist. We have known him for long, and we always felt disgust when we looked at him, when life got us into vicinity or even into touch with him. […] we looked for mild, historical explanations, why he is such a bent and shady character. […] We told ourselves that we need to suffer his presence […] he was a scoundrel. When Mauschel committed an indecency […]. When Mauschel acted lowly […]. When Mauschel compromised us all […].
Another false antisemitic statement and trope from a later paragraph would actually need to be applied to Zionists and Ziofascists living outside of Israel who infiltrate and undermine the governments of other countries to serve Israel — a fact already voiced by Montagu in 1917 (see above):
The Jew is [instead: Zionists and Ziofascists are!] capable to rigidly and honestly resist the government of his country out of conviction […]
In a similar fashion, the Jewish Zionist Theodor Herzl allied himself with white antisemitic racists for just as questionable results. The last sentence of the following Times of Israel article confirms and firmly establishes Herzl’s and Zionism’s own deep Antisemitism with regard to Antizionist Jews:
In 1894 France, Theodor Herzl, an Austro-Austrian journalist and playwright with a doctorate in law covered Captain Alfred Dreyfus’s trial for treason for the Viennese paper the Neue Freie Presse. The French captain’s case was more about antisemitism than treason, with calls by the public to kill Frances’ Jews despite them being emancipated for over 90 years. In the same year, Herzl wrote the play “The Ghetto” (1894), outlining that he no longer believed assimilation would end antisemitism; the only solution was a homeland for Jews. In 1896, Herzl wrote “Der Judenstaat” (The Jewish State, 1896), his grand manifesto outlining his plans for political Zionism to create a socialist and secular state. Herzl has spent his life and career hiding from his Judaism. However, with his belief in Zionism and leadership role, he began to embrace his Jewish identity and name Binyamin Ze’ev. In June 1897, Herzl created the Zionist newspaper, “Die Welt,” and after the Congress in September 1897, Herzl declared, “no true Jew can be an anti-Zionist.” (Penslar, 114)
Herzl’s Zionist Antisemitism or Antisemitic Zionism was also apparent to Orthodox Jews of his time who accordingly and wisely rejected it:
To move forward, Herzl wanted to create an organization that would work to realize a Jewish state, and he wanted to convene a Zionist Congress. According to historian Derek Penslar in Theodor Herzl: The Charismatic Leader, the Congress would serve as a “national parliament that would meet regularly and would authorize the creation of a council to manage the diplomatic enterprise.” (Penslar, 107) Herzl faced opposition after opposition to his Congress from many within the Jewish community. Especially the Orthodox rabbinate, which thought Herzl’s vision of a Jewish, violated the tenets of Judaism, which placed the Torah and commandments at the center of the religion.
Obviously, Herzl had also perverted a spiritual movement with non-secular aims into a movement with secular aims that cannot possibly live up to its original spiritual aims.
Close to the end of Herzl’s life, imperialist Britain began to adopt the Zionist project which led to yet more perversion of Judaism and Jewish life by way of Zionism and now also imperialism:
Joseph Chamberlain floated the idea of a Jewish Colony in what is now Kenya. The plan became known as the “Uganda Project” and Herzl presented it to the Sixth Zionist Congress (Basel, August 1903), where a majority (295:178, 98 abstentions) agreed to investigating this offer. […] In 1905 the 7th Zionist Congress, after investigations, decided to decline the British offer and firmly committed itself to a Jewish homeland in Palestine. A Heimstatte — a homeland for the Jewish people in Palestine secured by public law.
The 1917 Balfour Declaration furthermore underlines that Zionist Israel was and is an imperialist settler-colonialist project right from its inception which, like all such projects, is inherently directed against the native Palestinian people.
12.4 Zionism and Nazi Germany
Things became even weirder and more perverted when the imperialist German Nazis, who also wanted to get the Jews out of Europe, began to cooperate with Jewish Zionists and due to that overlap in interests. To quote from Mark Weber’s article “Zionism and the Third Reich”:
Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letters for its name, “Tel Aviv,” while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the ship was Zionist-owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party member. Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic combination as a “metaphysical absurdity.” Absurd or not, this is but one vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide-ranging collaboration between Zionism and Hitler’s Third Reich.
Common Aims
Over the years, people in many different countries have wrestled with the “Jewish question”: that is, what is the proper role of Jews in non-Jewish society? During the 1930s, Jewish Zionists and German National Socialists shared similar views on how to deal with this perplexing issue. They agreed that Jews and Germans were distinctly different nationalities, and that Jews did not belong in Germany. Jews living in the Reich were therefore to be regarded not as “Germans of the Jewish faith,” but rather as members of a separate national community. Zionism (Jewish nationalism) also implied an obligation by Zionist Jews to resettle in Palestine, the “Jewish homeland.” They could hardly regard themselves as sincere Zionists and simultaneously claim equal rights in Germany or any other “foreign” country.
Theodor Herzl (1860–1904), the founder of modern Zionism, maintained that anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely understandable response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes. The only solution, he argued, is for Jews to recognize reality and live in a separate state of their own. “The Jewish question exists wherever Jews live in noticeable numbers,” he wrote in his most influential work, The Jewish State. “Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving Jews … I believe I understand anti-Semitism, which is a very complex phenomenon. I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear.” The Jewish question, he maintained, is not social or religious. “It is a national question. To solve it we must, above all, make it an international political issue …” Regardless of their citizenship, Herzl insisted, Jews constitute not merely a religious community, but a nationality, a people, a Volk. Zionism, wrote Herzl, offered the world a welcome “final solution of the Jewish question.”
Six months after Hitler came to power, the Zionist Federation of Germany (by far the largest Zionist group in the country) submitted a detailed memorandum to the new government that reviewed German-Jewish relations and formally offered Zionist support in “solving” the vexing “Jewish question.”
So it is not just because of the nationalism of the Jewish Zionists but, ironically, also because of the rightwing extremist nationalism and Zionism of the German Nazis that Judaism was perverted and falsely identified as having something to do with Israel or its founding in Palestine.
This means that, on top of already being a British imperialist project and as one of history’s greatest ironies, Zionism and Israel also became a German Nazi imperialist project:
Active Collaboration
On this basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood, National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group believed was in its own national interest. As a result, the Hitler government vigorously supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine from 1933 until 1940–1941, when the Second World War prevented extensive collaboration.
Even as the Third Reich became more entrenched, many German Jews, probably a majority, continued to regard themselves, often with considerable pride, as Germans first. Few were enthusiastic about pulling up roots to begin a new life in far-away Palestine. Nevertheless, more and more German Jews turned to Zionism during this period. Until late 1938, the Zionist movement flourished in Germany under Hitler. The circulation of the Zionist Federation’s bi-weekly Jüdische Rundschau grew enormously. Numerous Zionist books were published. “Zionist work was in full swing” in Germany during those years, the Encyclopaedia Judaica notes. A Zionist convention held in Berlin in 1936 reflected “in its composition the vigorous party life of German Zionists.”
The SS was particularly enthusiastic in its support for Zionism. An internal June 1934 SS position paper urged active and wide-ranging support for Zionism by the government and the Party as the best way to encourage emigration of Germany’s Jews to Palestine. This would require increased Jewish self-awareness. Jewish schools, Jewish sports leagues, Jewish cultural organizations — in short, everything that would encourage this new consciousness and self-awareness — should be promoted, the paper recommended.
This perversion of Judaism by Zionism, including Nazi Germany’s Zionism, in turn gave rise to in spirit identical violent rightwing extremist Zionism aka Ziofascism or even Zionazism.
This literal Zionazism unfortunately still persists until today and for instance in the form of Israel’s current Zionazi regime under Benjamin Netanyahu and its genocidal supporters such as the 95-year-old Zionazi Ezra Yachin from the Stern Gang aka Lehi Zionazi terrorist organisation:
It is also through their shared genocidal aims and actions that the ‘older white genocide nations’ in Europe and North America, who had already genocided “the others” around the globe for centuries in their imperialist-colonialist endeavors, began to recognize Zionist Israel and its various genocidal terrorist and later terrorist state leaders as ‘one of their own’ and welcomed them to the club, so to speak:
In April of 1948, Lehi and the Irgun were jointly responsible for the massacre in Deir Yassin of at least 107 Palestinian Arab villagers, including women and children. Lehi assassinated Lord Moyne, British Minister Resident in the Middle East, and made many other attacks on the British in Palestine.[26] On 29 May 1948, the government of Israel, having inducted its activist members into the Israel Defense Forces, formally disbanded Lehi, though some of its members carried out one more terrorist act, the assassination of Folke Bernadotte some months later, an act condemned by Bernadotte’s replacement as mediator, Ralph Bunche. After the assassination, the new Israeli government declared Lehi a terrorist organization, arresting some 200 members and convicting some of the leaders. Just before the first Israeli elections in January 1949, a general amnesty to Lehi members was granted by the government.[29] In 1980, Israel instituted a military decoration, an “award for activity in the struggle for the establishment of Israel”, the Lehi ribbon. Former Lehi leader Yitzhak Shamir became Prime Minister of Israel in 1983.
12.5 Ziofascist Israel’s Rejection of Poor and Sick Jews Who Wanted to Immigrate
12.6 Ziofascist Israel versus the Jewish Holocaust Survivors Marek Edelman and Rene Lichtman
Marek Edelman (Yiddish: מאַרעק עדעלמאַן; 1919/1922 — October 2, 2009) was a Polish political and social activist and cardiologist. Edelman was the last surviving leader of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. Long before his death, he was the last one to stay in the Polish People’s Republic despite harassment by the Polish United Workers’ Party authorities.[3]
Before World War II, he was a General Jewish Labour Bund activist. During the war he co-founded the Jewish Combat Organization (ŻOB). He took part in the 1943 Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, becoming its leader after the death of Mordechaj Anielewicz. He also took part in the citywide 1944 Warsaw Uprising.[4]
[…]
As a child, Edelman was a member of Sotsyalistishe Kinder Farband (SKIF), the Jewish Labour Bund’s youth group for children.[10]
In 1939 he joined and became a leader in Tsukunft (Future), the Bund’s youth organization for older children.[11] During the war, he restarted these organizations inside the Warsaw Ghetto.[12]
The defiance and organization of the Bund made their mark on Edelman. As conditions for Jews worsened in the 1930s, Bund members preferred to challenge the mounting antisemitism rather than flee. Edelman later said: “The Bundists did not wait for the Messiah, nor did they plan to leave for Palestine. They believed that Poland was their country, and they fought for a just, socialist Poland in which each nationality would have its own cultural autonomy, and in which minorities’ rights would be guaranteed.”[9]
On his military resistance against the genocidal German Nazis:
In 1939, after the German invasion of Poland Edelman found himself confined — along with the other Jews of Warsaw — to the Warsaw Ghetto. In 1942, as a Bund youth leader he co-founded the underground Jewish Combat Organization (Żydowska Organizacja Bojowa, ŻOB). In the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of April–May 1943, led by Mordechaj Anielewicz, Edelman was one of the three sub-commanders and then became the leader after the death of Anielewicz.[13]
When the Germans had stopped their campaign of transporting Ghetto residents to Treblinka extermination camp in September 1942, only 60,000 had remained.[9] Edelman and his comrades, however, had had little doubt that the Germans would resume the job. The Jewish Combat Organisation had begun acquiring weapons and organizing into units that would make up for lack of training and munitions with an intimate knowledge of the ghetto, both above ground and in its sewer network.[9]
The Germans resumed their attack on the ghetto on April 19, 1943, with over 2,000 troops. According to Edelman: “The Germans weren’t expecting resistance of any kind, let alone that we would take up arms.” The outnumbered and outgunned Ghetto fighters’ strong resistance forced the German troops to withdraw.[9] It was on the second day of the Uprising, while protecting the retreat of Edelman and other comrades, that another prominent insurgent and Bundist, Michał Klepfisz, was killed.[14] Over the next three weeks, the fighting was intense. The Jewish fighters killed and wounded scores of Nazis but inevitably sustained far greater losses. On May 8, ŻOB’s commander, Mordechaj Anielewicz, was surrounded by German forces. Anielewicz died during the final assault on the ŻOB’s bunker on 8 May 1943, which meant that now Edelman was in charge. “After three weeks,” he recalled, “most of us were dead.”[9]
The Germans proceeded to flush out the few remaining fighters by burning down the ghetto — Edelman always insisted, “We were beaten by the flames, not the Germans.”[9] At that juncture, couriers from the Polish underground outside the ghetto came through the sewers that still linked it with the rest of Warsaw.[15] On the morning of May 10, Edelman and his few remaining comrades escaped through the sewers and made their way to the non-Ghetto part of Warsaw to find safety among their Polish compatriots. At this point the Uprising was over and the fate of those fighters who had remained behind is unknown.[9]
[…]
Edelman was a lifelong anti-Zionist.[23][24][25] In a 1985 interview, he said Zionism was a “lost cause” and questioned Israel’s viability.[26] He remained firmly Polish, refusing to emigrate to Israel.[27] In his old age, Edelman spoke in defence of the Palestinian people, as he felt that the Jewish self-defence for which he had fought was in danger of crossing the line into oppression.[28]
[…]
In August 2002, Edelman wrote an open letter to the Palestinian resistance leaders. Although the letter criticised the Palestinian suicide attacks, its tone infuriated the Israeli government and press. According to the late British writer and activist Paul Foot, “He wrote [the letter] in a spirit of solidarity from a fellow resistance fighter, as a former leader of a Jewish uprising not dissimilar in desperation to the Palestinian uprising in the occupied territories.”[36] He addressed his letter “To all the leaders of Palestinian military, paramilitary and guerrilla organizations — To all the soldiers of Palestinian militant groups.”[37]
Another Jewish Holocaust survivor by the name of Rene Lichtman with a conscience was dishonoured by Ziofascists in the United States in 2024:
Holocaust survivor Rene Lichtman, 86, laid down in the road outside a Detroit-area Holocaust museum to protest Israel’s military campaign in Gaza.
With other members of Jewish Voice for Peace in that December demonstration, Lichtman held up a sign. His read: “Jews and allies say never again for anyone.”
Days after the protest, Lichtman got a call from the CEO of the museum, The Zekelman Holocaust Center in Farmington Hills. Rabbi Eli Mayerfeld told him that the board had voted to remove him as a speaker in its Survivor Talk Sundays series.
For 10 years, Lichtman had spoken to school and other groups about his Jewish childhood in France during the Holocaust — the death of his father, and how his mother had entrusted a Catholic family outside Paris to hide him from the Nazis.
Lichtman said the conversation with the rabbi is now a blur, but it was clear that the board made its decision over his views on the war in Gaza.
He aligns his ousting to the experience of other war protesters called out for denouncing the war.
“What’s going on in the museums today, in the universities, is McCarthyism — Jewish McCarthyism,” he said. “Voices that are pro-Palestinian will get destroyed. You will lose your livelihood. The teachers will be thrown out. That’s the world we’re living in.”
The Zekelman Holocaust Center did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
This displays a pattern of Ziofascist Antisemitic abuse against all those Jews who had learned the to be learned lessons from the Holocaust, chiefly “Never again for anyone.”
12.7 The November 4, 1995 Yitzhak Shamir- and Benjamin Netanyahu-instigated Assassination of the Israeli PM Yitzhak Rabin
A significantly more well-known and consequential example for such Ziofascist murders of Jews is the assassination of Israel’s Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin on November 4, 1995 by the Zionazi Yigal Amir:
In 1992, Rabin was re-elected as prime minister on a platform embracing the Israeli–Palestinian peace process. He signed several historic agreements with the Palestinian leadership as part of the Oslo Accords. In 1994, Rabin won the Nobel Peace Prize together with long-time political rival Shimon Peres and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. Rabin also signed a peace treaty with Jordan in 1994. In November 1995, he was assassinated by an extremist named Yigal Amir, who opposed the terms of the Oslo Accords. Amir was convicted of Rabin’s murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.
But it was not just Yigal Amir who did it. The Israeli crowd already chanted “Bibi is a murderer” back then (just like later in 2023) since it was none other than the Likud politician Benjamin Netayahu — yet another Ziofascist terrorist Prime Minister of Israhell — who had instigated the assassination with Ziofascist and Zionazi hatemongering against Rabin:
Most likely also involved was Itamar Ben-Gvir, the totally insane Kahanist terrorist and Jewish Power party Israeli Minister of ‘National Security,’ who showed the public the front piece of Rabin’s car and who said that “We got to his car, we’ll get to him too” BEFORE Rabin was assassinated:
A Ziofascist torch march, just like the German Nazis:
Benjamin Netanyahu agitating the masses above a “Death to Arabs” slogan. The Ziofascist Irgun and Lehi terrorist leader and later Mossad director, Likud leader and Israeli PM Yitzhak/Isaac Shamir (1915–2012) can be seen leaning on the railing to Netanyahu’s right in a white shirt — a relationship perhaps best described as that between a string-pulling Sith lord and his apprentice:
Benjamin Netanyahu: “We have no other country. ….the murderer Arafat… I’m saying this to the government of Israel [i.e. Rabin’s], which is bowing down to this man. We are here, for we will never allow Jerusalem to be divided. We are here because we have only one Jerusalem, and we will defend her.”
12.8 Ziofascist Israel’s Support for Hamas
As for all the Israeli Jews killed by Hamas: It turns out that Hamas was massively supported by Ziofascist Israel in order to create a Palestinian bogeyman and an omnipresent Hamas-excuse to ethnically cleanse and genocide all Palestinians. This in turn means that every single Israeli Jew who was ever killed by Hamas was also killed with the support of Ziofascist Israel — a fact which once again underlines that and how Zionism, Ziofascism and Zionazism is a lethal form Antisemitism:
From the former US President Carter in 2013 based on his talks with Hamas representatives:
From a February 4, 2020 Haaretz article:
Mossad Chief Yossi Cohen visited Doha on February 5 in order to ensure Qatar continues its financial aid policy to the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip.
The visit came to light in an interview former Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman gave Israel’s Channel 12 News on Saturday, saying Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had sent Cohen and the Israeli military’s chief of Southern Command Herzl Halevi to “beg the Qataris to keep funneling money into Hamas.”
“Both the Egyptians and the Qataris are angry with Hamas, and they were going to cut all ties with them. All of a sudden Netanyahu shows up as a Hamas advocate, pressuring Egypt and the Qataris to continue” with the financial support, said Lieberman, adding that Netanyahu’s policy is tantamount to “surrender to terrorism.”
According to Walla news website, Cohen and Halevi stayed in Doha for less than 24 hours, meeting with the Qatari envoy to the Gaza Strip Mohammed al-Emadi and Qatari national security advisor Mohammed Bin Ahmed al-Misnad.
On Friday, Doha announced that it would increase Gaza Strip aid as part of the efforts to alleviate conditions and increase stability in the enclave. Qatar has transferred the Gaza Strip over $1 billion since 2012 with Israel’s approval, according to data presented by an international source to Israeli ministers in 2019.
Netanyahu spouting Ziofascist biblical Amalek nonsense in 2023:
12.9 Ziofascists’ Use of the Antisemitic “Self-hating/wrong kind of/fake Jew” Trope Against Jews
The Zionists’, Ziofascists’ and Zionazis’ clear Antisemitism is particularly apparent when they attack Antizionist Jews aka Jews with a conscience and morals as self-hating, the wrong kind of or even fake Jews:
From the Ziofascist Jerusalem Post — previously called Palestine Post — hasbara propagandist in chief Avi Meyer:
A professional Ziofacist Israeli propagandist and hatemongerer Noga Arbell tried to give a lecture on “Jewdism”:
From the head of the Ziofascist propaganda org ADL, Jonathan Greenblatt:
Jews being arrested by Ziofascists in Israel and abroad:
But Ziofascists acting against Antizionist, diaspora or even Holocaust survivor Jews is not surprising in the end. And that is because it is the purpose of Zionism to make Jews (feel) unsafe — even to terrorize them (see above)— in order to make them move to the no more than alleged safety of Ziofascist Israel:
Max Blumenthal (himself Jewish): “[…] what every Jew who lives in the diaspora needs to understand is that Zionism isn’t here to protect them. It’s here to imperil them by design. Zionism is designed to destabilize the Jewish diaspora in order to compel them to move to somewhere within the non-defined borders and militarized frontiers of Israel to be a part of its high-tech, Spartan, genocidal army and to help it wage demographic trench warfare against the Palestinians. […]
Zionism thrives off of anti-Semitism. Zionist organisations rely on anti-Semitism to pay their bills. Look at the Anti-Defamation League. […] It’s pretty obvious that they need anti-Semitism to exist. And so, Israel is actually an engine of anti-Semitism through what it does. […] I see Zionism as a kind of cult that is not only hostile to Muslims and Christians that live within its realm, but also to Jews who live across the world and want to just be normal Jews here.”
12.10 Ziofascist Israeli Violence Against Israeli Jews
To continue with more extreme acts of Ziofascist Israeli violence against Israeli Jews which furthermore demonstrate that Zionism, Ziofascism and Zionazism are inherently Antisemitic just like German Nazism:
12.11 Ziofascist Israeli Mistaken Identity Killings of Jews
Similar to the German Nazis and even though on a much smaller scale, the Zionists’, Ziofascists’ and Zionazis’ Antisemitism generally also manifested itself in those ‘chosen and supreme people’ killing Jews who do or, respectively, don’t fit into their racist and insane stereotypes.
A case from 2015:
A case from 2022, also related to anti-Asian racism in the context of Covid-19:
A case from December 2023 in which the Ziofascist Israeli Jewish settler Aviad Frija murdered another Israeli Jewish occupation forces terrorist in blind hatred and lust for Palestinian blood and suffering:
From a thread with some footage of the murder:
Another case from December 2023 in which three Israeli Jews were murdered by Ziofascist Israeli Jews:
A perhaps even more insane February 2025 case from the USA which also involved only Ziofascist Jews:
12.12 The Hannibal Directive: When Ziofascist Israel Deliberately Kills Israeli Jews
Beyond these mistaken identity attacks in which Ziofascist Jews or Judeo-Nazis attempted and often enough succeeded to kill the perceived to be non-Jewish ‘subhumans’ which turned out to be other Jews in acts of accidental Antisemitism, Ziofascist Israel also implements the so-called Hannibal Directive or Doctrine whereby that settler-colonialist terrorist regime deliberately kills Jews somewhat similar to Nazi Germany back in the day:
The Hannibal Directive (Hebrew: נוהל חניבעל) (or “Procedure” or “Protocol”) is a controversial procedure that Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have used to prevent the capture of Israeli soldiers by enemy forces.
It was introduced in 1986, after a number of abductions of IDF soldiers in Lebanon and the subsequent controversial prisoner exchanges. The full text of the directive has never been published and until 2003 Israeli military censorship even forbade any discussion of the subject in the press. The directive has been changed several times. At one time the formulation was that “the kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces.”[2]
The Hannibal directive has, at times, apparently existed in two different versions, one top-secret written version, accessible only to the upper echelon of the IDF, and one “oral law” version for division commanders and lower levels. In the latter versions, “by all means” was often interpreted literally, as in “an IDF soldier was ‘better dead than abducted’”. In 2011, IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz stated the directive does not permit killing IDF soldiers.[3]
The Hannibal directive has not prevented the capture of a single Israeli soldier.[4] Among the 11 Israelis involved in the seven reported Hannibal incidents, only one soldier (Gilad Shalit) survived.
The background:
Israel has with several notable exceptions adhered to the principle of not negotiating with terrorists and this especially in hostage situations. This policy led to some notable successes, such as Operation Entebbe, but also to tragic loss of human life, as in the Maalot Massacre. In cases where Israeli soldiers were captured and no military solution was found, Israel was forced to negotiate with the captors about an exchange of prisoners. Large parts of Israeli public opinion would not accept simply abandoning captured soldiers to their fate.
Already in 1970, the Palestinian movement Fatah managed to sneak over the Lebanese border and abduct a security guard in the northern settlement of Metulla and secure a swap of the guard for a senior member in Fatah, jailed in Israel. In 1979 Israel agreed to swap an Israeli POW in Palestinian hands for 76 convicted militants in Israeli jails.
After the 1982 Lebanon War Palestinian forces were holding nine IDF soldiers as POWs. Six were held by Fatah (the main faction of the PLO) and three by the pro-Syrian PFLP-GC. In 1983, Israel agreed to free 4,700 Palestinian and Lebanese prisoners, including several high ranking PLO officers, against the six Fatah prisoners. The following year Israel accepted to free another 1,150 Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails. Many of them were allowed to remain in Israeli controlled territory.
Perhaps even more insanely, the Ziofascist Israeli regime refused to receive from Hamas the two elderly female Israeli Jewish hostages Nurit Yitzhak and Yochvid Livshitz which Hamas then released anyway in October 2023, resulting in a big propaganda disaster for the genocidal Antisemitic terrorist state:
Ziofascist Israel’s initial refusal to accept these two well-treated hostages or similar offers from Hamas can essentially only be explained by the fact that this insane Antisemitic regime would rather see the hostages dead so as to have more excuses to genocide and forcibly displace all Palestinians from Palestine:
Others agree:
In October 2023, an October 7 Israeli kibbutz survivor confirms Ziofascist Israel’s application of the Antisemitic Hannibal Doctrine against Israeli Jews:
A November 2023 summary of Ziofascist Israel’s respective motivations and actions:
In December 2023, Ziofascist Israel and its ‘great leader’ Netanyahu even gassed to death Jewish Israeli occupation soldiers Nik Beizer, Ron Sherman and Elia Toledano in an incident that is eerily similar to Jews being gassed to death by Nazi Germany:
Another explicit confirmation of the Ziofascist Israeli regime applying the Antisemitic Hannibal Doctrine against Israeli Jews from January 2024:
Female hostage relative: “They are enacting on us the Hannibal Directive. […] The government of Israel, the cabinet of my country, my prime minister, my defense minister, they are enacting on my family, on our citizens, on civilians taken captive from their homes, the Hannibal Directive. They continue the fighting, even though it needs to be stopped. They are talking with us about pressure that is helping, that is supposed to help with a deal, but we see that not only it doesn’t help with anything […]. And on the other side we hear about our captives that are getting killed, losing their life, murdered by Hamas due to the military pressure.
[…]
We understand that we are killing our people. It’s a very very difficult statement, and it’s not easy for me to say it. […] And yet they are still enacting on the citizens on Israel the Hannibal Directive. My government is annihilating them.
Israeli television propagandist: “Allow me to be blunt. […] Listen, there is no deal on the table. There is no one to talk to… there is no… And this is said by the ministers, including the ministers in the cabinet that are willing to go very far for a deal.”
Female hostage relative: “Yes, I can tell you that you’re not blunt, you’re just wrong. You’re wrong and misleading. There is a deal, there are several offers for a deal, two right now, but it doesn’t matter. […]
First of all, deals — when you say, there is no deal on the table, you are assuming who is supposed to present the deal.”
Israeli television propagandist: “Hamas? Qatar? Egypt?”
Female hostage relative: “No, no, no.”
Israeli television propagandist: “Israel?”
Female hostage relative: “There is one sovereign, the state of Israel, the country that was founded for me and for my people. Israel is the sovereign who should offer deals. And it has the liberty, the right and the duty to be active and not just wait.”
Israeli television propagandist: “From the briefings that you receive, Israel did not offer anything?”
Female hostage relative: “The state of Israel is obstructing the process. […] Obstructing meaning refusing, creating difficulties, not cooperating. Galant and Netanyahu, my prime minister, both of them right now are the fingers in the cabinet that are obstructing the rescue of the captives. […] Because they don’t want to rescue the captives. […] It’s terrible and horrifying and they are counting on the fear of most of the captives’ families, that we wont say what must be said. The Israeli government […] are captive to a dangerous and belligerent opposition.”
To add insult to injury or the Ziofascist Israeli slaughter of Israeli Jews, Netanyahu’s degenerate Judeo-Nazi son Yair — who stayed far away in the USA — had the audicity to complain about too few Israeli Jews having been killed and that the Antisemitic Hannibal Doctrine should have been implemented more vigorously:
In February 2025, yet more confirmation that of Ziofascist Israel’s Antisemitic Hannibal Doctrine was ironically provided by the genocidal terrorist state’s ‘star hostage’ Noa Argamani at the UN:
12.13 Jews’ Increasing Rejection of Zionism and Israel as Antisemitic, Criminal, Evil, Inhumane and Insane
Antizionist Jews aka Jews with a conscience consequently have a message for Zionists, Ziofascists and Zionazis who dare to speak for or to patronize them:
From November 2023:
February 2024:
(Former) antisemitism educator: “And so I’m speaking as an antisemitism educator when I say that the entity which is doing the most to drive antisemitism around the world and to make my job impossible is the state of Israel. I was trying to educate people on harmful tropes against Jews, like the story of blood libel […]. However, today, in the state of Israel, you have the largest massacre of children in modern history. 10.000 kids have been murdered by Israel over the last couple months, and at the same time as they are doing that and killing all these kids — and we’ve all seen the dead bodies and the mourning parents — Israel is over there saying ‘We’re Jews, we speak for all Jews, we’re all Israel and Judaism, that’s the same. And if you don’t like dead babies and you’re criticizing us for killing all these babies, that makes you an antisemite.’”
September 2024:
“What’s so fascinating about Israel’s mythology to me is this necessity of making Jews feel alone, of constantly saying ‘Everybody hates you, everybody is antisemetic, no one’s gonna have your back’ when — as soon as I stepped away from Zionism, like the moment I started thinking more critically about Zionism, and Israel is a colonial project, and ethnonationalism is inherent in this politic — I gained community. I am not alone. […] I have never had a stronger community than I do now. […]”
October 2024:
“My rabbi blocked me. I lost my whole [Zionist and Ziofascist] community, as a Jewish person, um, everyone that I grew up with, everyone that I went to Hebrew school with and went to preschool with, and was posting Zionist propaganda. And nobody seemed to, um, wanna listen to reason, and so I blocked them. […]
October 2024:
November 2024:
Conclusion: Dezion(az)ification
Ziofascist propagandists — see Harry’s Place below — and those blinded by their propaganda still attempt to deny Israel’s great and many similarities to Nazi Germany. But fortunately, more and more people — including Jews — understand that and how Zionism, Ziofascism and Israel are imperialist, settler-colonizer, racist, genocidal, terrorist Nazi Germany continuity and hence Nazi Germany 2.0:
The *Zionists and Ziofascists* are really the Nazis indeed:
As a consequence and similar to denazification after World War 2, we need dezion(az)ification, especially among and for Jews and in order to help them get out of this evil and insane Ziofascist and Zionazi cult:
