Ziofascist Israel’s 2023 to 2024 Genocide of Palestinians, Part 36: November 5 to 6, 2024–The US (Ziofascist S)Election of Trump
A documentation of Ziofascist Israel’s 2023 to 2024 genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity against Palestinians from November 5 to 6, 2024 in the context of the (s)election of the Ziofascist-controlled Donald Trump as US President.
Ziofascist Israeli attacks on hospitals and civilians in North Gaza:
The destruction and annexation of North Gaza:
Israel-imposed starvation of Palestinians:
A massacre of Palestinians who waited for food in Beit Lahia:
Some military resistance against the genocide:
Genocidal war criminal Yoav Gallant fired and replaced by Israel Katz:
UN and UNRWA:
Ziofascist Israeli UN ambassador Danny Danon: “They promote hate in those drawings”
Danny Danon: “[T]his exhibition was fixed and these antisemitic drawings were removed from the walls.”
Also Ziofascist Israel:
Azerbaijan and Turkey:
Britain:
BBC reporter: “We’ve been hearing a drone over our heads, very loud, quite low in the sky for the last few minutes. [runs]”
Canada:
[…]
Albanese is now urging UN member states to “use all their political leverage — commencing with a full arms embargo and sanctions — so that Israel stops the assault against the Palestinians, accepts a ceasefire and fully withdraws from the occupied Palestinian territory in line with the ICJ Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024”
That is the message she is carrying to Canada and to Canadian officials this week.
Lobby desperate to stop her
Albanese’s message, that Canada needs to act, has provoked a huge campaign against her by Canada’s Israel lobby.
The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs has condemned Albanese and called on the Canadian government to ban her from entering Canada, strip her of diplomatic immunity and called for Canadian politicians to refuse to have any meetings with her. Bnai Brith has claimed it is “astounded and appalled” that she is allowed to speak on the UofT campus.
The CIJA campaign has been supported by long articles in the National Post accusing her of antisemitism and associating with terrorists.
Neither CIJA, nor Bnai Brith, nor the National Post articles have attempted to refute any of Albanese’s findings. Instead, they deliberatedly confuse her strong criticisms of Israel with antisemitism and even support for terrorism.
[…]
Independent Jewish Voices unequivocally stands in support of Francesca Albanese, the UN Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian Territory, in the face of a shameful smear campaign orchestrated by organizations like CIJA, B’nai Brith, and UN Watch.
These groups have (once again) resorted to unsubstantiated accusations of antisemitism against Ms. Albanese, cynically weaponizing this serious charge in a blatant attempt to silence a respected human rights advocate whose work holds Israel accountable for its ongoing occupation, genocide, and systemic abuses in Palestine.
These baseless accusations come from pro-Israel lobbying groups and politicians while Israel itself is waging war against the UN. Israel’s bombardment of Gaza and Lebanon has killed and injured hundreds of UN aid workers, while Israel’s parliament has recently passed bills banning UNRWA.
These allegations are blatant attempts to smear and discredit Albanese’s work documenting human rights abuses in order to justify Israel’s ongoing and flagrant violations of international law. They are disingenuous and intended to distort the truth, diminishing the genuine fight against antisemitism.
These organizations are grasping at straws, weaponizing the term to shield Israel from critique rather than addressing the root causes of violence and oppression in the region — Zionism.
Independent Jewish Voices calls on the public to see through this baseless and cynical campaign against Francesca Albanese.
We urge others to stand up against this abuse of power, recognizing the damage caused to Jewish communities when false accusations of antisemitism are wielded.
By trivializing antisemitism to stifle advocacy for Palestinian rights, these organizations not only betray their own biases but actively undermine the struggle against real antisemitism.
Ireland:
A senior US diplomat warned tánaiste Micheál Martin’s office and the taoiseach of “consequences” if government enacted the Occupied Territories Bill — 90 minutes before Martin issued a statement committing only to a “review” rather than enactment of the legislation.
US Ambassador to Ireland Claire Cronin contacted several government offices last month, telling them she was “closely following developments related to the Occupied Territories Bill”, which would ban the sale and import of goods from illegally occupied Palestinian territory.
Cronin offered to “connect” attorney general Rossa Fanning — who recommended the “significant amendments” Micheál Martin claims are necessary to the bill — and government enterprise teams, with “relevant offices in Washington”.
This would, said Cronin, “ensure the best outcome” for the legislation — which government blocked in 2019 after a secret pledge to the Israeli government from Paschal Donohoe to “block” it.
Shortly after government received Cronin’s correspondence, Martin publicly announced the bill would undergo a review rather than be enacted.
‘The best possible outcome’ (for the US diplomat)
On 22 October US ambassador to Ireland Claire Cronin sent an email warning of “consequences” for Ireland if the Occupied Territories Bill proceeded.
She sent the email at 2.33pm.
The ambassador sent the email, seen by The Ditch, Department of Foreign Affairs secretary general Joe Hackett, the Department of Enterprise address, as well as taoiseach Simon Harris and Department of the Taoiseach secretary general John Callinan. Assistant secretary for EU and International Division Helen Blake, US deputy chief of mission Michael Clausen and another state department official also received it.
“I am closely following developments related to the Occupied Territories Bill, as are colleagues in Washington,” wrote Cronin.
“We are concerned that, if enacted in its current form, the bill would cause economic uncertainty for almost 1,000 US companies operating in Ireland because the US Export Administration Act prohibits companies from complying with an ‘unsanctioned foreign boycott.’”
The ambassador told officials to “conduct thorough due diligence” to “avoid any unforeseen consequences”.
“I encourage your teams to conduct thorough due diligence on the bill’s potential impact to avoid any unforeseen consequences that could detract what you hope to achieve with this legislation,” she wrote.
Cronin also offered to set up what she thought would be useful meetings.
“My team is happy to connect your AG and enterprise teams with the relevant offices in Washington for discussions to ensure the best outcome,” she wrote.
The Ditch has contacted attorney general Rossa Fanning for comment.
On 1 November, 10 days after warning government about economic consequences of passing the Occupied Territories Bill, Cronin posted a photo on social media, standing alongside taoiseach Simon Harris, announcing 550 Microsoft jobs for Dublin.
The ambassador praised “the ever-strengthening U.S.-Ireland trade and investment relationship” in what she called “this year of centenary celebrations of diplomatic relations.”
Mail from the diplomat. Ninety minutes pass. The bill is to be reviewed
Less than ninety minutes after receiving Cronin’s email, at 4.02pm, tánaiste Micheál Martin announced that rather than bring the Occupied Territories Bill into law, “the bill will be reviewed and amendments will be prepared in order to bring it into line with the constitution and EU law.”
The tánaiste cited “a range of complex policy and legal issues to be resolved” and said government would progress the review “in consultation with the attorney general, relevant ministers and the sponsor of the bill (Senator Frances Black).”
The statement described the review as “one element of the government’s approach to the devastating violence and the appalling humanitarian situation in Gaza and the West Bank.”
The government previously blocked the Occupied Territories Bill in early 2019. Then finance minister Paschal Donohoe told his Israeli counterpart, in a “confidential call” not recorded in his ministerial diary, that government would use the money message mechanism to stop it.
Records from the Israeli Ministry of Justice show officials had discussed using corporate influence against the bill in January 2019.
“We must understand and find out what are the ways and options before us in order to influence and cause the repeal or postponement of the law… Do you take direct action against the opposition party? Or through the lobbying actions of the companies?” wrote Ministry of Economy representative Yossi Ackerman.
The US embassy, the Departments of Foreign Affairs, the Department of Enterprise, and the Department of Taoiseach have been contacted for comment.
Japan:
Malaysia:
2024 US (Ziofascist S)Elections:
A Democratic Zionist detached from reality:
True predictions:
Western mainstream propaganda:
November 6
Want to know a fun fact about Palestinians? They’re hard to kill. You can bomb them, bury them under rubble, burn them alive and they still don’t seem to die at the rates of normal people. How else do you explain the fact the death count in Gaza barely seems to budge, even though not a day seems to go by without another new massacre and with starvation and the spread of disease only getting worse?
A staggering 43,000 dead Palestinians. That’s the official number the most recent coverage cites. That’s when a number is cited at all: many pieces on Gaza don’t even mention the death count anymore.
I obviously have no idea how many people have been killed in Gaza. Partly that’s because — and I don’t understand why every single journalist in the west is not appalled by this — the foreign press is not freely allowed in. Meanwhile — and, again, I don’t understand why every single journalist in the west is not enraged by this — Palestinian journalists are being wiped out. There is essentially a media blackout. So it’s hard to assess the death toll. But what I do know is this: citing that official 43,000 figure without providing a long list of caveats feels like journalistic malpractice at this point.
First, anyone citing the death toll should include the fact that UN estimates from May (which was months ago!) found there are likely 10,000 people buried at the bottom of the rubble in Gaza who can’t be counted. Not to mention the fact that there are people dying of preventable diseases every day because adequate medication is not being allowed into the strip and the healthcare system is barely functioning.
And they should stress the fact that counting is almost impossible; there is no infrastructure left by which the dead can measured or properly mourned. Palestinians are being blown into such small pieces at such alarming rates that there are frequently no meaningful remains to count. I recently spoke to Dr Nizam Mamode, a British surgeon who worked in Gaza with Medical Aid for Palestinians during August and September, who told me people in the hospital morgue have to weigh body parts to try and assess how many people are killed: “So 70 kilograms is one body because they will just get brought in bits of bodies.” Mamode, like everyone who has actually been on the ground in Gaza, emphasizes that the official death figure is likely an underestimate.
By now, many people believe the actual death toll is likely in the hundreds of thousands. In July the Lancet medical journal published a piece that estimated around 186,000 total deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza — roughly 7.9% of its population. Writing in the Guardian last month, Devi Sridhar, chair of global public health at the University of Edinburgh, noted that if deaths continue at this rate estimated deaths by the end of the year would be 335,500 in total. That’s 15% of the population. Sridhar has also noted that the Lancet used a conservative estimate and actual figures may be much higher.
Apologists for what is happening will shrug their shoulders and say: this is what happens in war. It’s tragic, but it’s war; innocent people die all the time. But, here’s the thing, wars have rules. They have limits. The scale of destruction in Gaza strongly suggests that this is no longer war by any normal standards. Indeed, numerous experts are raising the alarm that this is now a genocide. Still, much of the mainstream media seems to be blithely ignoring these warning bells, continuing the pretence that what is happening is a normal war rather than a systematic extermination.
Omer Bartov, an Israeli-American historian who is a professor of Holocaust and genocide studies at Brown, is one of the experts who believes what is happening in Gaza is a genocide. He didn’t always believe this to be the case. Last November, Bartov wrote a piece for the New York Times stating: “I believe that there is no proof that genocide is currently taking place.” But this came with a disclaimer: “There is genocidal intent, which can easily tip into genocidal action … There is still time to stop Israel from letting its actions become a genocide.”
Intent is a key component of genocide, which is legally defined as committing certain specified acts (including killing and imposing measures intended to prevent births) with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.
The genocidal intent Bartov mentions is the dehumanizing language and threats of total annihilation from Israeli politicians and influential figures. There are hundreds of these statements out there. Bartov cites an example from 9 October, when Major General Giora Eiland wrote in the daily newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth: “The State of Israel has no choice but to turn Gaza into a place that is temporarily or permanently impossible to live in.” In another article, Eiland wrote that “Gaza will become a place where no human being can exist.”
In November, when Bartov wrote his Times piece, those genocidal intents hadn’t fully been matched with genocidal action. But that changed, in Bartov’s view, in May 2024, when the IDF started its assault on the city of Rafah, despite being warned not to by the US. That was a major tipping point, Bartov told me in a recent phone call. That was when it became genocide.
“When you look back, you could see that there was a concerted effort, not only to move the population over and over again, but also to destroy everything that makes the life of a group possible,” Bartov says. “There was a concerted and intentional effort to destroy universities, schools, hospitals, mosques, museums, public buildings and housing and infrastructure. If you look back, you could say that this was happening from the beginning. But the kind of proof in the pudding was this last effort in Rafah.”
Rafah was a grim milestone. But the very last stage of this genocide, Bartov says, is happening right now in Jabalia in north Gaza, where over 1,000 people have been killed in the last three weeks. What’s happening in north Gaza should not be considered — as it often seems to be in the media — as just more bombing. Rather, Bartov notes, it is a genocidal campaign clearly based on The General’s Plan.
“This is a plan sketched out by retired General Giora Eiland, which has been discussed for months now in the Israeli media, to empty that region of civilians through military pressure and starvation … This is a first step toward annexing the Strip north of the Netzarim Corridor, which will lead to its settlement by Jews and will itself be only the first phase in the gradual takeover of increasing portions of the Strip, squeezing civilians into ever shrinking areas and eventually either forcing them out of the Strip or causing ever larger numbers of them die. In short, this is a genocidal plan.”
The ICJ will likely not rule for years about whether the situation in Gaza meets the narrow legal definition of a genocide. But Bartov believes that the operation in Jabalia is so blatantly genocidal that “it is possible that the ICJ will find this operation to be genocide even if it hedges on the war in Gaza as a whole.” Which is what happened in the case of Bosnia, where the massacre in Srebrenica was found to be genocide.
Genocide — coined by Polish-Jewish jurist Raphael Lemkin during the second world war to describe the Nazi extermination campaigns — is obviously one of the most serious words there is. It’s not a term that anyone should throw around lightly. There were a lot of Israel’s critics, Bartov believes, who were using the term irresponsibly in the days after 7 October, and labelling Israel’s actions a genocide when they had not yet reached that point. The term, he notes, has been watered down to some extent: “It has been used so often as a kind of anti-Israeli phrase that it has lost a lot of its value.”
At the same time, says Bartov, because the genocide convention comes in the wake of the Holocaust, there’s a tendency to say that if it’s not the Holocaust then it’s not genocide. “If we don’t have extermination camps, if it’s not being done across the continent, if it’s not the Nazi regime carrying it out, then it’s not a genocide.”
More broadly, genocide can be a problematic term. The genocide scholar Dirk Moses, who wrote a 2021 book called The Problems of Genocide, has argued that it isn’t really fit for purpose anymore because it “produces a hierarchy of mass death that organizes and distorts thinking about civilian destruction”. Its legal definition is also so narrow that even if the entire population of Gaza were wiped out it might still not be considered genocide.
Even with all those qualifications, however, Bartov believes it’s better to have a legal definition of genocide than not to have it. “Because if you are aware of it and you are aware of what are the indicators of that possibly about to happen, then you can try to stall it in various ways.”
Again: genocide is a loaded term. It is not a term that Bartov, who is a leading scholar of genocide, throws around lightly. And yet, he believes it’s time for the media, which shies away from using the g-word, “to face facts”. What’s unfolding in Gaza is genocide.
Israeli ground forces are getting closer to “the complete evacuation” of northern Gaza and residents will not be allowed to return home, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has said, in what appears to be the first official acknowledgment from Israel it is systematically removing Palestinians from the area.
In a media briefing on Tuesday night, the IDF Brig Gen Itzik Cohen told Israeli reporters that since troops had been forced to enter some areas twice, such as Jabaliya camp, “there is no intention of allowing the residents of the northern Gaza Strip to return to their homes”.
He added that humanitarian aid would be allowed to “regularly” enter the south of the territory but not the north, since there are “no more civilians left”.
International humanitarian law experts have said that such actions would amount to the war crimes of forcible transfer and the use of food as a weapon.
On Thursday, an IDF spokesperson said Brig Gen Cohen’s comments had been taken out of context during a discussion about Jabaliya, and did not “reflect the IDF’s objectives and values.” The spokesperson also said that the briefing had been on background, and the brigadier general should not have been quoted in Hebrew media reports that emerged.
The Israeli army and government have repeatedly denied trying to force the remaining population of northern Gaza to flee to the relative safety of the south during a month-long renewed offensive and tightened siege. Residents still clinging on in the north have said the new operation has created the worst conditions of the war to date. Israel said the push is necessary to combat regrouped Hamas cells.
Rights groups and aid agencies have alleged that despite the denials, Israel appears to be carrying out a version of the so-called “generals’ plan”, which proposes giving civilians a deadline to leave and then treating anyone who remains as a combatant.
It is unclear how many people remain in northern Gaza; last month, the UN estimated there were about 400,000 civilians unable or unwilling to follow Israeli evacuation orders. On Wednesday social media footage showed waves of several dozen displaced people carrying children and rucksacks and walking south through flattened areas of Gaza City.
Many had not eaten in days, Huda Abu Laila told the Associated Press. “We came barefoot. We have no sandals, no clothes, nothing. We have no money. There is no food or drink,” she said.
At least 15 people were killed in an Israeli airstrike on the northern town of Beit Lahiya on Wednesday, Al Jazeera reported, but communication difficulties meant there was no official account of the strike from the Gaza health ministry. Hussam Abu Safia, the director of Beit Lahiya’s struggling Kamal Adwan hospital, posted a video of patients fleeing from the top floors of the building as it was hit by artillery fire.
Israel cut the territory in two earlier this year by creating what it calls the Netzarim corridor, separating what was once the densely populated Gaza City from the rest of the strip. In Tuesday’s briefing, Cohen also confirmed that northern Gaza has now been split again, to divide Gaza City from the more rural north.
Resettling or permanently reoccupying Gaza is not official Israeli policy, but senior Israeli defence officials recently told the Israeli daily Haaretz that with no other alternatives on the table, the government is aiming to annex large parts of the territory. […]
From that November 4, 2024 article:
Israeli internal intelligence arrested four Israelis, one of whom works in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office, on charges of leaking and falsifying classified documents concerning the ongoing war on Gaza, an Israeli court revealed over the weekend.
The fabricated documents allegedly leaked by one of Netanyahu’s aides were falsely attributed to the late Hamas leader, Yahya Sinwar. The revelations of the recent fabrications repudiate Israeli propaganda claims of Hamas’s alleged intransigence in ceasefire negotiations throughout the war, especially during the last round of negotiations over the summer. During those negotiations, Netanyahu had insisted that Israel must maintain a permanent military presence along the Philadelphi corridor, a strip of land bordering Gaza and Egypt, because he claimed that Hamas was using it to smuggle weapons and supplies. At around the same time, the leaked documents falsely claimed that the Philadelphi corridor was to be used by Hamas to smuggle Israeli captives out of Gaza alongside Sinwar.
According to Israeli media reports, the main suspect in the leak affair, Eli Feldstein, works as a spokesperson at Netanyahu’s office. The Israeli Prime Minister’s office initially denied that any of its members had been arrested in the case, and later clarified that Feldstein is not an official employee but a private contractor who has been working with Netanyahu for the past year and a half. The clarification came after Israeli media outlets pointed out images and footage of Feldstein accompanying Netanyahu in government meetings and in field visits to sensitive military sites.
These recent revelations offer further evidence that it was not Hamas that stood in the way of a ceasefire over the summer, but Netanyahu’s intransigence.
Sabotaging ceasefire negotiations
The leak case was classified by Israel’s military censor until the Israeli court revealed the name of the main suspect. According to Israeli reports that followed the easing of censorship, highly classified documents acquired by the Israeli army in Gaza were misquoted, misattributed, and selectively leaked alongside fabricated information to the media in a way that served Netanyahu’s purpose of sabotaging a potential ceasefire and captives exchange deal — in service of his agenda of prolonging the war.
The leaked information reportedly included allegations of documented proof that Hamas did not want a ceasefire deal and that its leader, Yahya Sinwar, was preparing to smuggle himself and Israeli captives out of Gaza through the Philadelphi corridor, from which Netanyahu at the time was refusing to withdraw as part of any ceasefire deal. These claims were based on altered quotes from classified documents obtained by the Israeli army in Gaza, which were in turn falsely attributed to Sinwar.
The fabricated and leaked information was reported by the UK-based The Jewish Chronicle and the German-based Bild, which also reported based on the leaked information that Hamas was only engaging in ceasefire talks as a form of psychological warfare.
The stories that appeared in The Jewish Chronicle and Bild were published in July around the same time that Netanyahu was insisting on Israel’s alleged need to maintain control of the Philadelphi corridor, against the advice of Israeli army officials and Israeli intelligence. This intransigence on Netanyahu’s part is what caused the collapse of the ceasefire talks. The negotiations have not started up again since then.
Reactions
Reactions from the Israeli political scene were swift. Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid said in a televised statement that the news of the leaks should “scare every Israeli,” stressing that “if Netanyahu knew [about the leaks] then he is complicit in one of the gravest crimes in our laws.” The other Israeli opposition leader and former member of the war cabinet, Benny Gantz, also said in a statement that the case “is not only about leaking documents, but selling state secrets for political gain,” adding that “if sensitive security information was stolen and used for the campaign in a politician’s campaign, then it’s not just a penal crime, but a crime against the nation.”
Although no formal accusation has yet been made against Netanyahu personally, Israeli media sources claim that the leaks are part of an unofficial policy among Netanyahu’s inner circle. Israeli daily Yediot Ahronot quotes an unnamed high-ranking Israeli security official who claims that Netanyahu’s office has an entire team secretly working to leak information whenever pressure increases on the Prime Minister to conclude a ceasefire deal.
The leaks have been seen by some analysts as part of an ongoing standoff between Netanyahu’s government and the Israeli army, which has been increasingly advocating for an end to the war on both Gaza and Lebanon’s fronts and the conclusion of a prisoner swap, while Netanyahu continues to insist on prolonging the war.
Meta censorship of Anas Al-Sharif
Norwegian Refugee Council:
UN and UNRWA:
Muhannad Hadi spoke to UN News from the Al-Mamouniya School in Gaza City run by the UN agency that assists Palestine refugee, UNRWA.
Like the rest of UNRWA’s schools that are still standing as war continues, it now serves as a shelter for displaced people seeking safety in the besieged enclave where nowhere is safe.
An ‘unbearable’ situation
“This is not a place for humans to survive,” he said. “This must end. This misery must end. This war must end. This is beyond imagination.”
Mr. Hadi stated that what he saw was “very different” from what he saw in northern Gaza in September.
“At this school, I have seen families and people living on top of each other. It is unbearable here. I can’t imagine how those people are surviving,” he said.
“There were 500 people in this school in September, and now there are more than 1,500 people. There is no access to bathroom. There are shortages of food. The situation is unbearable. Sewage water is everywhere. Waste is everywhere. The place has garbage everywhere.”
‘Just water and lentils’
From a window on the second floor of the damaged school, mountains of garbage can be seen piling up in the yard — a symbol of the immense health hazards and harsh conditions that the people inside face.
Critical supplies including food are scarce in northern Gaza. As Mr. Hadi walked around the school, whose structure had been damaged by the bombing, he met a man who was preparing lentil soup for his family.
Mr. Hadi was told that the lentils had been provided by UNRWA and that the small pot the man carried was supposed to feed 12 people.
“It’s just water and lentils; no garlic or onions,” he remarked, noting that “one chili pepper pod costs 10 shekels today.”
2024 US (Ziofascist S)Elections:
Massively supporting the Ziofascist Israeli genocide of Palestinians is a big factor for why the Democrats lost:
A timeless truth on ‘liberals’ by Malcolm X:
Malcolm X: “That white person that you see calling himself a liberal is the most dangerous thing in the entire Western Hemisphere. He’s the most deceitful. He’s like a fox, and a fox is always more dangerous in the forest than the wolf. You can see the wolf coming, you know what he’s up to.
But the fox will fool you. He comes at you with his mouth shaped in such a way that, even though you can see his teeth, you think he’s smiling and take him for a friend.”
By contrast:
Democratic Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib defeated her Republican opponent in Michigan’s 12th congressional district election on Tuesday, securing a fourth term as the only Palestinian-American woman in the US Congress.
The Associated Press called the race with just 18 percent of the votes counted.
Tlaib secured 77 percent of the vote, defeating the Republican Party’s James Hooper who received just 19 percent of the vote.
Her victory comes amid the backdrop of Israel’s war on Gaza, which has killed more than 43,000 Palestinians so far and has been diplomatically and militarily supported by the Biden-Harris administration for more than a year.
Tlaib has been a vocal critic of the war, calling for the US to withhold weapons from Israel. Her opposition to the war on Gaza and support for pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses have drawn harsh criticism from both Republicans and Democrats.
The ‘liberal’ ‘Democratic’ establishment only has itself to blame for the loss:
‘Liberal’ mainstream media were and are misleading as usual:
‘Liberal’ ‘Democrats’ attempting to shift the blame away from themselves and their genocidal and otherwise despicable ways:
Consequences of Trump being (s)elected (by the US-based oligarchy):
The US House of Representatives is just as Zionist-controlled as the presidency:
Trump’s nightmare neocon Ziofascist cabinet picks:
For a continuously updated list of Trump picks and confirmations, see the following link:
The only remotely sensible Trump nomination so far is that of John Ratcliffe as CIA Director and for instance insofar as, contrary to 50+ intelligence community liars and disinformers, Ratliffe took the Hunter Biden laptop scandal seriously:
Overall though, the Trump picks read like Ziofascist, end times cultist, war against Iran picks so far.
Trump’s Chief of Staff Susie Wiles:
Marco “Narco” Rubio as Secretary of State:
Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense (of Israel):
Ziofascist Pete Hegseth: “Anyone who wants to take the stage and talk about dual loyalty is dead wrong. What this organisation represents, what Western civilization represents today, is an understanding that Zionism and Americanism are the frontlines of Western civilization [i.e. genocidal settler-colonialist mass murder] and freedom [of the parasitic elites] in our world today. *applause*
And what better time for that relationship? From the scrapping of that terrible Iran deal to the embassy move, the recognition of Jerusalem as the capitol of the Jewish [i.e. Ziofascist] state, and the recognition of the Golan Heights — this president [i.e. Trump] is a true friend of the [terrorist] state of Israel. *applause*
It is an eternal bond, an unbreakable bond, that represents faith and freedom and fidelity to historic, religious and, and cultural traditions — the opposite of secularism, and Islamism and anti-Semitism. *applause* […]”
Mike Waltz as ‘National Security’ Advisor:
Kristi Noem as DHS Secretary:
Lee Zeldin as EPA head:
Steve Witkoff as Special Envoy to the Middle East:
Elise Stefanik as UN ambassador:
Mike Huckabee as US ambassador to Israel:
An apt summary of Trumpian politics:
One solution to this Ziofascist corruption, encroachment and infiltration is to go beyond electoral politics:
Britain:
