Ziofascist Israel Is Nazi Germany 2.0, Part 1—Similarities 1 to 5: Fascism, Imperialism, Settler-Colonialism, Expansionism, Broken Promises
An article in six parts: Similarity 1: Zionist Israel Is a Fascist State Like Nazi Germany; Similarity 2: Ziofascist Israel Is an Imperialist State Like Nazi Germany; Similarity 3: Ziofascist Israel Is a Settler-Colonialist State Like Nazi Germany; Similarity 4: Ziofascist Israel Is an Expansionist State Like Nazi Germany; Similarity 5: Ziofascist Israel Broke Its Promises Like Nazi Germany; Conclusion: Dezion(az)ification. (Part 2)
Since October 2023 when Ziofascist Israel committed its so far worst genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity against Palestinians, an increasing number of people have pointed out that Ziofascist Israel is eerily similar to Nazi Germany and that there it is therefore immensely ironic to support that genocidal terrorist state in the context of Holocaust remembrance and “never again”:
And no, that comparison of Ziofascist Israel to Nazi Germany is not ‘just Russian propaganda’ (note that Russia or rather the Soviet Union under Stalin incurred the greatest losses to Nazi Germany in World War 2 and played the greatest military part in its downfall) but simply heavily supported by the evidence:
When genocidal Zionazis messaged the Palestinian reporter and translater Refaat Al-Areer who was later murdered by them on December 6, 2023:
A photoshopped image with the Israeli actress Gal Gadot also drives the point home:
What follows are the five fundamental similarities between Ziofascist Israel and Nazi Germany due to which current day Israel can rightly be regarded as the contemporary Nazi Germany 2.0.
Similarity 1: Zionist Israel Is a Fascist State Like Nazi Germany
Nazi Germany was anything but a democracy, and while Israel claims that it is ‘the only democracy in the middle east,’ it is actually also very similar to Nazi Germany since it is likewise a fascist ethnocracy where you can only rule when you belong to the ‘right’ and rightwing extremist kind of people with a fascist ideology.
From the Israeli polymath Yeshayahu Leibowitz (1903–1994), as narrated by the journalist Chris Hedges:
Yeshayahu Leibowitz (Hebrew: ישעיהו ליבוביץ; 29 January 1903–18 August 1994) was an Israeli Orthodox Jewish public intellectual and polymath. He was a professor of biochemistry, organic chemistry, and neurophysiology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, as well as a prolific writer on Jewish thought and western philosophy. He was known for his outspoken views on ethics, religion, and politics. Leibowitz cautioned that the state of Israel and Zionism had become more sacred than Jewish humanist values and went on to describe Israeli conduct in the occupied Palestinian territories as “Judeo-Nazi” in nature while warning of the dehumanizing effect of the occupation on the victims and the oppressors.
Chris Hedges: “The scholar, Yeshayahu Leibowitz, who Isaiah Berlin called the conscience of Israel, warned that ‘If Israel did not separate church and state, it would give rise to a corrupte rabbinate that would warp Judaism into a fascistic cult. Religious nationalism is to religion what National Socialism is to socialism,’ warned Leibowitz, who died in 1994. He understood that the blind veneration of the military […] was dangerous and would lead to the ultimate destruction of democracy. ‘Our situation will deteriorate to that of a second Vietnam, to a war and constant escalation without prospect of ultimate resolution,’ he wrote. […]
He warned that the rise of virulent racism would consume Israeli society. He knew that prolonged occupation of Palestinians would spawn concentration camps for the occupied, and that in his words ‘Israel would not deserve to exist and it will not be worthwhile to preserve it.’
The decision to obliterate Gaza has long been the dream of Israeli fanatics, heirs of the fascistic movement led by the extremist Meir Kahane, who was barred from running for office and whose Kach Party was outlawed in 1994 and declared a terrorist organization by Israel and the United States.
These Jewish extremists, who today make up the ruling coalition government, are orchestrating a genocide in Gaza, where hundreds of Palestinians are being killed or wounded a day. The champion the iconography and language of their homegrown fascism. Jewish identity and Jewish nationalism are the Zionist versions of blood and soil.
Jewish supremacy is sanctified by God, as is the slaughter of the Palestinians who are compared to the biblical Amalekites massacred by the Israelites. Enemies, usually Muslims, are slated for extinction are subhuman who embody evil. Violence and the threat of violence are the only forms of communication those outside the magic circle of Jewish nationalism understand. Millions of Muslims and Christians, including those with Israeli citizenship, are to be purged.”
From Max Blumethal’s 2013 book Goliath in which he also compared Ziofascist Israel with Nazi Germany:
Notably, the term “Nazi” also derives from “Nationalsozialismus” or “national socialism,” and this is also a highly fitting description of Ziofascist Israel which is a nationalist extremist and ‘socialism for Jews only’ kind of state:
A typical Ziofascist, in that case from the USA:
One could also call Israel an “apartheid” regime, but that is actually too weak of a term since, contrary to Israel, the apartheid regime in South Africa was not hellbent on eliminating or driving the native population out of their own ancenstral lands:
The fact of Zionist Israel being (led by) a fascist regime can also be understood from Israhell receiving support and supporting other such people and political movements:
That Zionist Israel is a fascist regime and anything but a democracy was also illustrated by the fact that protestors fittingly sang the anti-fascist “bella ciao” song at one pro-human rights and pro-Palestinian demonstration:
An apt summary:
More from Israeli ‘democracy’/Ziofascism, starting with a January 10, 2024, Times of Israel article:
Eight-five Knesset members have signed a document calling for impeachment proceedings against Hadash-Ta’al MK Ofer Cassif over his public support for a South African motion accusing Israel of genocide before the International Court of Justice in The Hague.
Yisrael Beytenu MK Oded Forer started a petition Monday to expel the far-left lawmaker from the Knesset, calling his public endorsement of Pretoria’s motion against Israel “treasonous.”
Lawmakers from both the coalition and the opposition have signed onto it, including several from war cabinet minister Benny Gantz’s National Unity party and Opposition Leader Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid.
Cassif, the only Jewish member of the Arab-majority Hadash-Ta’al party, signed a petition of support last week for South Africa’s case and has publicly accused Israeli leaders of advocating for crimes against humanity against the Palestinians.
According to Basic Law: The Knesset, 90 Knesset members, or 75 percent, may vote to expel a colleague who expressed support “for an armed struggle” against the State of Israel. Once 70 signatures are collected, the matter is referred to the Knesset House Committee and if approved there, goes to the plenum for a vote.
Should Cassif be found to have supported armed struggle against Israel, he will be the first MK to be impeached for doing so since the impeachment law was enacted in 2016.
January 27:
From a January 31 Time article:
In early January, Israeli lawmaker Ofer Cassif caused a political firestorm when he expressed his support for South Africa’s case accusing Israel of “genocidal acts” against Gaza’s Palestinians at the International Court of Justice in The Hague. Now, Cassif risks the prospect of being removed from office altogether after an Israeli parliamentary committee voted 14–2 on Tuesday to expel him from the Knesset, the Israeli legislature. The final decision, which will be put to Cassif’s fellow lawmakers in an unprecedented vote, could come in a matter of weeks.
Cassif has long been one of the most vocal opponents of Israel’s bombardment of Gaza. In the days following Hamas’s Oct. 7 massacre, which he described as “appalling,” he accused the Israeli government of using the carnage “as an excuse to attack Gaza as part of the realization of this fascist subjugation plan.”
While Cassif’s expulsion is far from certain (if the Knesset votes to affirm the decision, as is expected, he will still have the opportunity to appeal the decision to the country’s Supreme Court), his colleagues say that the prospect of his removal marks a dangerous precedent — one in which political dissent, particularly against the ongoing war in Gaza, is no longer tolerated.
“They are trying to criminalize the anti-war position,” says Aida Touma-Sliman, who like Cassif is a lawmaker for the left-wing Democratic Front for Peace and Equality Party (known as al-Jabha or Hadash in Arabic and Hebrew, respectively). The Association for Civil Rights in Israel, the country’s oldest human rights organization, called Tuesday’s vote “a shameful act of McCarthyism.”
February 5:
Hence not just “Zionism” or “Zionist,” but “Ziofascism” and “Ziofascist.”
Similarity 2: Ziofascist Israel Is an Imperialist State Like Nazi Germany
There can also be no doubt that Ziofascist Israel is an imperialist state like Nazi Germany, last but not least since it was already conceived like that by imperialist Britain in the early nineteenhundreds:
For those interested in an academic lecture about the imperialist nature of Israel:
In November 2023, the Democratic and later independent US presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. impressively confirmed that and how Israel still functions as a Western imperialist project:
Israel is of course also the Jewish Zionists’, Ziofascists’ and Zionazis’ own imperialist project.
Similarity 3: Ziofascist Israel Is a Settler-Colonialist State Like Nazi Germany
Third and also since imperialism goes hand in hand with colonialism, there can furthermore be no doubt that Ziofascist Israel is a colonialist state and, more specifically, a settler-colonialist project just like Nazi Germany and other such imperialist entities:
From the Israeli historian Ilan Pappé:
Ilan Pappe: “[…] the Zionist movement existed before, but I think it’s in the mid-1920s when it started to purchase land and evict the people who were living on that land. And that happened around 1926. It became a settler-colonial project and not just a project for salvaging Jews from anti-Semitism, or a national cultural redefinition of Judaism as nationalism instead of as religion.
The moment that happened, it was very clear that it’s going to impose itself by force on an indigenous native population. And it was not just the classical settler-colonial imposition of settlers from abroad imposing themselves on a native population. It also was kind of creating this idea that they can produce or establish a European state in the midst of the Arab world, ah, very much like the white supremacists in South Africa.
And there’s two facts that you’re trying to implement in a project of displacement and replacement of an indigenous population, and that you’re trying to create a cultural political entity that would alienate the area it belongs and the area would alienate you, ah, […] had been sold in the 1920s. And we can see the effect of this to our day, no doubt.”
Ilan Pappe: “[…] Teddy Kollek as the mayor of Jerusalem oversaw the ethnic cleansing of quite a large number of Palestinians from East Jerusalem in order to make space for building new Jewish neighborhoods, which should rightly be called Jewish colonies or settlements.
So in the end of the day, the Zionist vision, even in its most liberal version, meant that the Palestinians at best — at best — could be tolerated as individuals in limited spaces within Palestine. That would be determined according to the Israeli notion of national security. And at worst, they’re an obstacle that has to be removed.
And as the time went by, most of the Israeli Jews said ‘Why just be content with limiting their presence? Why not get rid of them altogether.’”
Even David Ben-Gurion, Ziofascist Israel’s first Prime Minister, confirmed that Israel is a landstealing and -robbing settler-colonialist entity:
The parallels between settler-colonialist USA and Israel over time:
That Israel is a settler-colonlialist state can also be understood from Israel’s cooperation with other such colonialist states against the colonized and oppressed native populations:
The respective parallels to Nazi Germany were pointed out by none other than an Israeli general:
There is also the Nazi concept of “Lebensraum im Osten” or “living space in the East” — and Israel’s desired Lebensraum im Osten is the Palestinians’ West Bank:
But there is also the Israeli colonization of Gaza:
And interestingly, even Netayahu himself openly proposed settler-colonialism as part of his election campaign:
To facilitate their settler-colonialist aims, the Ziofascist Israelis commit the crimes of genocide and displacement and have the audacityl to call it ‘voluntary (e)migration’:
“Voluntary Migration”
Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, reportedly told lawmakers from his Likud party in recent days that he is pushing for the “voluntary migration” of Palestinians in Gaza.
He said that the challenge was finding “countries that are willing to absorb [them], and we are working on it.”
“Voluntary migration” is euphemistic language for a coerced mass expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza — a proposal made by senior Israeli politicians such as finance minister Bezalel Smotrich throughout the war.
Removing Palestinians from their homeland so they may be replaced by foreign Jewish settlers has always been the single organizing principle of the state of Israel.
Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were forced from their lands by Zionist forces around the time of the declaration of the state of Israel in 1948.
Israel’s military operations in Gaza — which have rendered the territory unsuitable for sustaining human life by destroying housing, medical facilities and other essential infrastructure — appear to be aimed at forcing an expulsion on that same scale or even greater.
Israel’s evacuation orders are pushing Gaza’s population of 2.3 million Palestinians to an increasingly narrow coastal area near the Egyptian border
From that December 28 article by Mouin Rabbani:
Senior Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, are again publicly advocating the ethnic cleansing of the Gaza Strip. Their proposals are being presented as voluntary emigration schemes, in which Israel is merely playing the role of Good Samaritan, selflessly mediating with foreign governments to find new homes for destitute and desperate Palestinians. But it is ethnic cleansing all the same.
Alarm bells should have started ringing in early November when U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and other Western politicians began insisting there could be “no forcible displacement of Palestinians from Gaza.” Rather than rejecting any mass removal of Palestinians, Blinken and colleagues objected only to optically challenging expulsions at gunpoint. The option of “voluntary” displacement by leaving residents of the Gaza Strip with no choice but departure was pointedly left open.
Ethnic cleansing, or “transfer” as it is known in Israeli parlance, has a long pedigree that goes back to the late-nineteenth-century beginnings of the Zionist movement. While the early Zionists adopted the slogan, “A Land Without a People for a People Without a Land,” the evidence demonstrates that, from the very outset, their leaders knew better. More to the point, they clearly understood that the Palestinians formed the main obstacle to the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine. This is for the simple reason that, to them, a “Jewish state” denotes one in which its Jewish population acquires and maintains unchallenged demographic, territorial, and political supremacy.
Enter “transfer.” As early as 1895, Theodor Herzl, the founder of the contemporary Zionist movement, identified the necessity of removing the inhabitants of Palestine in the following terms: “We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country … expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.” David Ben-Gurion (née Grün), Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, and later Israel’s first prime minister, was more blunt. In a 1937 letter to his son, he wrote: “We must expel the Arabs and take their place.”
Writing in his diary in 1940, Yosef Weitz, a senior Jewish National Fund official who chaired the influential Transfer Committee before and during the Nakba (“Catastrophe”), and became known as the Architect of Transfer, put it thus: “The only solution is a Land of Israel devoid of Arabs. There is no room here for compromise. They must all be moved. Not one village, not one tribe, can remain. Only through this transfer of the Arabs living in the Land of Israel will redemption come.” His diaries are littered with similar sentiments.
The point of the above is not to demonstrate that individual Zionist leaders held such views, but that the senior leadership of the Zionist movement consistently considered the ethnic cleansing of Palestine an objective and priority. Initiatives such as the Transfer Committee, and Plan Dalet, initially formulated in 1944 and described by the pre-eminent Palestinian historian Walid Khalidi as the “Master Plan for the Conquest of Palestine,” additionally demonstrate that the Zionist movement actively planned for it. The 1948 Nakba, during which more than four-fifths of Palestinians residing in territory that came under Israeli rule were ethnically cleansed, should, therefore, be seen as the fulfillment of a longstanding ambition and implementation of a key policy. A product of design, not of war (historical Christmas footnote: the Palestinian town of Nazareth was spared a similar fate only because the commander of Israeli forces that seized the city, a Canadian Jew named Ben Dunkelman, disobeyed orders to expel the population, and was relieved of his command the following day).
That the Nakba was a product of design is further substantiated by the Transfer Committee’s terms of reference. These comprised not only proposals for the expulsion of the Palestinians but, just as importantly, active measures to prevent their return, destroy their homes and villages, expropriate their property, and resettle those territories with Jewish immigrants. Weitz, together with fellow Committee members Eliahu Sassoon and Ezra Danin, on June 5, 1948, presented a three-page blueprint, entitled “Scheme for the Solution of the Arab Problem in the State of Israel,” to Prime Minister Ben-Gurion to achieve these goals. According to leading Israeli historian Benny Morris, “there is no doubt Ben-Gurion agreed to Weitz’s scheme,” which included “what amounted to an enormous project of destruction” that saw more than 450 Palestinian villages razed to the ground.
The understandable focus on the expulsions of 1948 often overlooks the fact that ethnic cleansing remains incomplete unless its victims are barred from returning to their homes by a combination of armed force and legislation, and thereafter replaced by others. It is Israel’s determination to make Palestinian dispossession permanent that distinguishes Palestinian refugees from many other war refugees.
After 1948, Israel put out a whole series of fabrications to shift responsibility for the transformation of the Palestinians into dispossessed and stateless refugees onto the Arab states and the refugees themselves. These included claims that the refugees voluntarily left (they were either expelled or fled in justified terror); that Arab radio broadcasts ordered the Palestinians to flee (in fact, they were encouraged to stay put); that Israel conducted a population exchange with Arab states (there was nothing of the sort); and the bizarre argument that because they’re Arabs, Palestinians had numerous other states while Jews have only Israel (by the same logic, Sikhs would be entitled to seize British Columbia and deport its population to either the rest of Canada or the United States).
[…]
Ethnic cleansing after 1967
In 1967, Israel seized the remaining 22 percent of Mandatory Palestine — the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip. Depopulation in these territories operated differently than in 1948. Most importantly, Israel, in addition to prohibiting the return of Palestinians who fled hostilities during the 1967 June War, and encouraging others to leave (by, for example, providing a daily bus service from Gaza City to the Allenby Bridge connecting the West Bank to Jordan), conducted a census during the summer of 1967 . Any resident who was not present during the census was ineligible for an Israeli identity document and automatically lost their right of residency.
As a result, the population of these territories declined by more than twenty percent overnight. Many of those thus displaced were already refugees from 1948. Aqbat Jabr Refugee Camp near Jericho, for example — until 1967, the West Bank’s largest — became a virtual ghost town after almost all its inhabitants became refugees once again in Jordan. So many Palestinians from the Gaza Strip ended up in Jordan that a new refugee camp, Gaza Camp, was established on the outskirts of Jerash. The occupied Palestinian territories would not recover their 1967 population levels until the early 1980s.
[…]
Depopulation through administrative rule
In subsequent years, Israel employed all kinds of administrative shenanigans to further reduce the Palestinian population of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Until the 1993 Oslo Accords, for example, an exit permit from Israel’s military government was required to leave the occupied territory. It was valid for only three years and thereafter renewable annually for a maximum of three additional years (for a fee) at an Israeli consulate. If a Palestinian lost an exit permit or failed to renew an exit permit prior to its expiration for any reason (including bureaucratic foot-dragging), or couldn’t pay the renewal fee, or failed to return to Palestine prior to its expiration, that Palestinian automatically lost residency rights. Separately, Israel, over the years, deported numerous activists and community leaders, primarily to Jordan and Lebanon. During the late 1960s and 1970s, it also exiled Gaza Palestinians accused of resisting the occupation, along with their families, to prison camps in the occupied Sinai Peninsula. Among those who spent time there was the iconic Palestinian leader Haidar Abdel-Shafi.
A particularly notable case of administrative deportations occurred in 1992 after Israeli special forces botched an operation to rescue an Israeli soldier who had been seized by Hamas to exchange him for their imprisoned leader, Shaikh Ahmad Yasin. Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin ordered the summary deportation of approximately 400 Palestinians, many of them prisoners affiliated with Hamas and Islamic Jihad (PIJ), none accused of involvement in the incident that led to Rabin’s frenzied rage.
And it is not just a few rotten apples at the top but the vast majority of Israelis themselves who support that continued criminal settler-colonialist enterprise of theirs:
In reality and as per the Likud charter, it is Ziofascist Israelis who are wiping Palestine and Palestinians off the map:
The ‘logic’ behind it:
Like other settler-colonizers before them such as the British in Australia or the Europeans who colonized North America, the Ziofascist Israeli colonizers likewise entertain the notion of taking children away from their parents and brainwashing them in ‘schools’ aka detention centers for children to try to make the natives love their settler-colonialist oppressors and erase the actual history of the land from their minds:
All of the above also underlines an important principle:
Similarity 4: Ziofascist Israel Is an Expansionist State Like Nazi Germany
Nazi Germany understood itself as the “Dritte Reich” or “third empire,” a term which
referred to the Nazi claim that Nazi Germany was the successor to the earlier Holy Roman Empire (800–1806) and German Empire (1871–1918). The Third Reich, which the Nazis referred to as the Thousand-Year Reich, ended in May 1945, after only 12 years.
And empires such as Nazi Germany are typically expansionist, both in terms of their state borders and their spheres of influence.
The very same also applies to the Ziofascist Israeli vision of a “greater Israel” which would not only incorporate the Palestinian territories but also all of Jordan and Lebanon as well as parts of Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Egypt:
From the Ziofascist Israeli finance minister Bezalel Smotrich:
Bezalel Smotrich [with insane cultist eyes]: “It is written that the future of Jerusalem is to expand to Damascus. Only Jerusalem, until Damascus.”
Narrator: Bezalel Smotrich has a radical vision for the promised land, and it includes all Palestinian lands, but also lands in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and Egypt. Even in Saudi Arabia. Certainly an extremist vision, but it is an accepted one in Israel’s public discourse.
From David Miller, one of the greatest contemporary scholars on Zionism, Ziofascism and the Israel lobby and its networks:
These megalomaniac imperialist expansionist plans are already given away by the Ziofascist Israeli flag by the way: In it, the top blue line symbolizes the river Euphrates in Syria and Iraq whereas the bottom blue line symbolizes the river Nile in Egypt, with the psychotic terrorist entity of Israel wedged in between and as symbolized by the Star of David which, come to think of it, has interesting numerical properties due to recurring appearances of the number 6:
You can also listen to their imperialist expansionist plans straight out of the mouth of a rabbi who, true to Ziofascist Israel’s inherent nature, lives in an illegal settlement:
Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel [as per the translation]: “[…] we are in no danger, our hand is strong. It is our duty to conquer, a duty explained by the Rambam [i.e. Maimonides aka Moses ben Maimon (1138–1204), “a Sephardic Jewish philosopher who became one of the most prolific and influential Torah scholars of the Middle Ages”] […], a holy duty to conquer ‘Eretz Israel [i.e. the Land of Israel]. It is our duty to conquer, and since we are commanded to conquer, it overrides the Sabbath.
Even if not one bullet is fired at us, even if the residents of Gaza […] would be constantly offering us flowers, with love letters and drawings of hearts, we would be obliged — on the Sabbath — to start a war to conquer ‘Eretz Israel. […] This is our land, our holy land. God has promised us this land.
The Zionist Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel was also honest enough to state that this Zionist conquering process had already begun in 1948:
Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel [as per the translation]: When Israel was established, we had conquests. […] There were some very large operations that had nothing to do with defense. Their purpose was clearly conquest — conquest of territories that were not designated to us by the UN, areas not included in the partition plan. All the Negev [desert] was a huge takeover, all the Negev. No one attacked us from the Negev. To Eilat… Did anyone shoot at us from Eilat? Were we threatened? There was not one Jewish soul there. Conquest.
Hence also the Ziofascists ‘holy’ conquest of the Gaza strip — and eventually parts of Egypt:
Rabbi Eliezer Kashtiel [as per the translation]: The Gaza strip is no doubt ‘Eretz Israel. No question about it. Even by the most minimalistic views of the Southern border […] ‘Eretz Israel is at the El Arish river. The El Arish river is many kilometers after the Gaza strip. And these are the minimalist views.
Rashi [1040–1105], Hagaon Mevilna [1720–1797], Kuzari [i.e. Judah Halevi’s Book of the Khazar (1139–40)] all believe it is till Egypt River, meaning till the delta of the Nile, which is still… we still have a lot to do. All the north of Sinai is ours.
On the morphing and equation of “‘Eretz Israel” to “Greater Israel” under the rightwing extremist Likud party (1973-present):
When Israel was founded in 1948, the majority Israeli Labor Party leadership, which governed for three decades after independence, accepted the partition of Mandatory Palestine into independent Jewish and Arab states as a pragmatic solution to the political and demographic issues of the territory, with the description “Land of Israel” applying to the territory of the State of Israel within the Green Line. The then opposition revisionists, who evolved into today’s Likud party, however, regarded the rightful Land of Israel as Eretz Yisrael Ha-Shlema (literally, the whole Land of Israel), which came to be referred to as Greater Israel. Joel Greenberg, writing in The New York Times relates subsequent events this way:
The seed was sown in 1977, when Menachem Begin of Likud brought his party to power for the first time in a stunning election victory over Labor. A decade before, in the 1967 war, Israeli troops had in effect undone the partition accepted in 1948 by overrunning the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Ever since, Mr. Begin had preached undying loyalty to what he called Judea and Samaria (the West Bank lands) and promoted Jewish settlement there. But he did not annex the West Bank and Gaza to Israel after he took office, reflecting a recognition that absorbing the Palestinians could turn Israel it into a binational state instead of a Jewish one.
Following the Six-Day War in 1967, the 1977 elections and the Oslo Accords, the term Eretz Israel became increasingly associated with right-wing expansionist groups who sought to conform the borders of the State of Israel with the biblical Eretz Yisrael.
More confirmation of the Ziofascist Israelis’ totally insane imperialist expansionist Greater Israel plans can be gleaned from one of their IOF officers:
Yet more confirmations of those massively expansionist Greater Israel plans from female Ziofascist nutjobs:
From the same Ziofascist:
Daniela Weiss head of the Ziofascist Nahala settlement movement:
Ziofascist settler Daniella Weiss: “The land of Israel belongs to the people of Israel, and all of Gaza belongs to the land of Israel. According to the map, from the Euphrates river to the Nile river. What if it’s in our hands? We’ve just seen the Arabs leaving [their homes]. We have to invade. When? Directly after the war. We can invade the northern borders immediately.”
From an interview with the same insane Ziofascist settler:
For decades, Daniella Weiss has been one of the leaders of Israel’s settlement movement. Weiss became involved in settlement politics in the wake of the 1967 war. In the early seventies, her family moved to the settlements in the West Bank and she later served for a decade as mayor of Kedumim, a community in the north. She has also been arrested numerous times, including for assaulting a police officer and interfering with an investigation into the destruction of Palestinian property. More recently, she has been affiliated with the Nachala settlement organization, which helps younger settlers establish illegal outposts in the West Bank, an initiative that’s controversial even among the settler community. (Weiss is a neighbor and an ally of Bezalel Smotrich, the extremist minister of finance, who has said that the Palestinian people do not exist and that Palestinian communities need to be erased; he also lives in Kedumim.)
[…]
You said, “Settlement is the way to return to Zion”?
Yes. It’s the end of the dispersion and the beginning of the revival of the Jewish nation in this homeland.
What are the borders of that Jewish nation?
The borders of the homeland of the Jews are the Euphrates in the east and the Nile in the southwest. [This would include the territory of multiple Middle Eastern countries as well as the territory that Israel controls today.]
[…]
Palestinian communities have been removed from their land, kicked off their land by —
No, you never read things like that. No. There are no pictures. [According to a report by Btselem, an Israeli human-rights group, parts of Kedumim, where Weiss lives, were built on private Palestinian land; in 2006, Peace Now found that privately owned Palestinian land comprised nearly forty per cent of the territory of West Bank settlements and outposts.]
O.K. I’m a little surprised you are denying this. I thought you were going to say, “It’s O.K. to kick Palestinians off land because it belongs to the Jewish people.”
You did no homework before you interviewed me. Everything that you say is the opposite of my personality and my philosophy. You are interviewing a person, and you don’t know anything about them. It’s very strange. I’ve never encountered a situation like this.
[…]
So you think it was a mistake to pull out of settlements nearly twenty years ago?
It was a mistake. The whole world is crying now because of that. The whole world suffers from Hamas’s rise. Not my problem. It’s your problem. No country in the world said they were going to accept even a thousand people from Gaza. The world hates them. It was such a big mistake to let them rise.
Where should the Palestinians in Gaza go?
To Sinai, to Egypt, to Turkey.
They’re not Egyptian or Turkish, though. Why would they go to Turkey?
O.K. The Ukrainians are not French, but when the war started they went to many countries.
Daniella Weiss: “They want to see the sea. In order to see the sea, all homes in Gaza must be destroyed. There are no homes left in Gaza. This is a logical and romantic demand.”
Daniella Weiss: “You have to brainwash all the time. You have to say it, to ‘explain’ it, to live it […]. My husband says ‘Why do you speak to your children all the time about Zionism […], settling and settling’ — and all my family are settlers here. Because this is the only way to continue Zionism.
I want to have for the Jewish nation the promised land from the Bible — from the Euphrates to the Nile, and I’m sure it will be.
Interviewer: “What about southern Lebanon?”
Daniella Weiss: “If it’s… It is a part of it, all of it. Even parts of Syria, part of Iraq, part of Iran, it’s a… it’s huge!”
Interviewer: “You think you have any way of convincing people that that would be a good idea?”
Daniella Weiss: “I convinced many. Many people believe in it. I don’t see anything, ah, ahm, like ah, anything… extreme in my approach. It’s the basic Jewish [i.e. Ziofascist!] approach.”
The Ziofascist Israelis’ settler-colonialist expansionism also explains why, despite some pretenses, they would never agree to a two-state solution and a state for the Palestinians:
Similarity 5: Ziofascist Israel Broke Its Promises Like Nazi Germany
The German Nazis were also known to break all sorts of promises or pacts such as, perhaps most dramatically, the secret August 23, 1939, Hitler-Stalin aka Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact which covered the secret partition of Poland and Eastern Europe between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union or a public non-aggression agreement between those two states:
The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, officially the Treaty of Non-Aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics,[1][2] was a non-aggression pact between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union with a secret protocol that partitioned Central and Eastern Europe between them. The pact was signed in Moscow on 23 August 1939 by German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop and Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov.[3] Unofficially, it has also been referred to as the Hitler–Stalin Pact,[4][5] Nazi–Soviet Pact,[6] or Nazi–Soviet Alliance.[7]
The treaty was the culmination of negotiations for an economic agreement between the USSR and Nazi Germany which the Soviets used to obtain a political agreement — see Nazi–Soviet economic relations (1934–1941) § 1938–1939 deal discussions. On 22 August, Ribbentrop flew to Moscow to finalize the treaty, which the Soviets had sought before with Britain and France. The Molotov–Ribbentrop pact, signed the next day, guaranteed peace between the parties and was a commitment neither government would aid or ally itself with an enemy of the other. In addition to the publicly announced stipulations of non-aggression, the treaty included the Secret Protocol, which defined the borders of Soviet and German spheres of influence across Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Finland. The secret protocol also recognised the interest of Lithuania in the Vilnius region, and Germany declared its complete uninterest in Bessarabia. The rumoured existence of the Secret Protocol was proven only when it was made public during the Nuremberg trials.[8]
Soon after the pact, Germany invaded Poland on 1 September 1939. Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered the Soviet invasion of Poland on 17 September, one day after a Soviet–Japanese ceasefire came into effect after the Battles of Khalkhin Gol,[9] and one day after the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union approved the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact.[10] After the invasions, the new border between the two countries was confirmed by the supplementary protocol of the German–Soviet Frontier Treaty.
However,
Germany unilaterally terminated the pact at 03:15 on 22 June 1941 by launching a massive attack on the Soviet Union in Operation Barbarossa.[120] Stalin had ignored repeated warnings that Germany was likely to invade[234][235][236] and ordered no “full-scale” mobilisation of forces although the mobilisation was ongoing.[237] After the launch of the invasion, the territories gained by the Soviet Union as a result of the pact were lost in a matter of weeks. The southeastern part was absorbed into Greater Germany’s General Government, and the rest was integrated with the Reichskommissariats Ostland and Ukraine. Within six months, the Soviet military had suffered 4.3 million casualties,[238] and three million more had been captured.[239] The lucrative export of Soviet raw materials to Germany over the course of the economic relations continued uninterrupted until the outbreak of hostilities. The Soviet exports in several key areas enabled Germany to maintain its stocks of rubber and grain from the first day of the invasion to October 1941.
And it is once again very similar with Ziofascist Israel which never had any serious intentions to honor the “peace process,” the “Oslo Accords” or a “two-state solution.” To for instance quote from the 2015 article “Palestine de-Osloised”:
What is happening in Palestine? Is it a new intifada? If so, what are its slogans?
Many compare the current situation in Palestine with apartheid South Africa. The tribal chiefs of the South African bantustans — the nominally independent Black-ruled “homelands” created by the racist government — used to believe that they were heads of sovereign states. The apartheid regime promoted the fiction of Black independence under its overall control in an attempt to legitimize and perpetuate white rule.
While the anti-apartheid movement and most of the world rejected the idea of separation based on racial identity in South Africa, the Palestinian leadership boasts of having laid the foundation for its own bantustan, claiming it to be the “State of Palestine.”
For Zionism to survive in Palestine, the “other” — the indigenous Palestinian people — must be assimilated and subjugated without being conscious of that subjugation. This was the thinking behind Israel’s decision to grant Palestinians “autonomy” under the Palestinian Authority. It is the logic behind the 1993 Oslo accords between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization that created that authority.
Oslo aimed to bring about the Palestinians’ surrender and create among them a passive consciousness, but its architects did not foresee that Israel created its antithesis — defiance and reaction — as a result of decades of ethnic cleansing, settler-colonialism and apartheid.
Or to quote from this 2017 article by the former British ambassador Craig Murray:
As a younger man I was in charge of the South Africa (Political) Desk of the FCO. The grand plan of apartheid was that the white population would have unique right of residence in most of South Africa, with the black population corralled into crowded and resourceless Bantustans, many commuting into the white areas as a cheap labour force. These Bantustans were, according to the masterplan of apartheid, to be recognised as Independent states. The FCO had a current struggle to head off Mrs Thatcher’s desire to indeed recognise the first of them, Bophutatswana, as independent after apartheid South Africa recognised it.
The parallels between the Bantustan plan and the “two state solution” are obvious and the high profile supporters of the “two state solution” are insincere. In 2002 Blair and Bush announced in the Rosa Garden they were jointly proposing the “two state solution”. Their motivation was precisely the same as Thatcher’s in pushing for support of the proposed state of Bophutatswana — to allow the formal marginalisation of the indigenous population from their land. The “two state” Palestine was never intended to be viable.
So like Hitler’s imperialist and settler-colonialist Nazi Germany and as explained in the earlier sections, the actual and long-standing goal of Ziofascist Israel is not peace or coexistence but the expansion of its territory to create “Lebensraum” (i.e. living space) for the supposedly chosen people (here: the Ziofascist Jews).
And just like Hitler’s Nazi Germany, Ziofascist Israel also implements that goal through the elimination of the supposedly undesirable, othered and dehumanized natives and local populations (here: the Palestinians and Arabs in general) who having been living in the Ziofascist-desired lands for a long time before the preominantly white Ziofascist settler-colonialists arrived.
Talk about a supposed ‘peace process’ or ‘two-state solution’ — the latter being a talking point that every Western Ziofascist regurgitates even while Ziofascist Israel is implementing ‘the final solution of the Palestinian question’ via mass displacement, genocide and a second Nakba — is therefore little but a propagandistic distraction from Ziofascist Israel’s actual goals.
The above is furthermore clear evidence that, just like Hitler and Nazi Germany, Ziofascist Israel and its ‘great leaders’ likewise never had any intention of honoring their promises and agreements. The great Ziofascist leader Benyamin Netanyahu himself explained that in the following video:
Benyamin Netanyahu: “The main thing is first of all to strike them not once but several times, so painfully that the price they pay is unbearable. So far the price tag is not unbearable. (I mean) a large-scale attack on the Palestinian Authority, causing them to fear that everything is about to collapse. Fear is what brings them to…
female voice: “Hold on, but then the world will say that we’re the aggressors”
Benyamin Netanyahu: “They can say whatever they want.”
female voice: “Aren’t you afraid of what they’ll say Bibi?”
Benyamin Netanyahu: “Especially today with the US, I know how they are. America is something that you can easily maneuver and move in the right direction. And even if they say something: So then they say something, so what? 80% of Americans support us. It’s absurd. Look, I wasn’t afraid to maneuver (the Clinton administration). I wasn’t afraid to confront Clinton [presumably with Jeffrey Epstein-obtained sexual blackmail material], I wasn’t afraid to go against the UN.
What happened with the Oslo Accords, the accords which were ratified by parliament? I was asked before the (1996) elections: ‘Will you fulfill them?’ I said ‘Yes, subject to reciprocity and minimising pullouts.’ I gave my own interpretation to the agreements in such a way that will allow me to stop the race back towards the 1967 borders.
How did we manage to do this? Nobody defined what ‘military facilities’ are. So I also defined them as being security zones. The entire Jordan Valley for me is a ‘military facility.’ Nobody has… Yes, like the Beit Shean Valley. You see, go figure. But then there was the question of ‘Who will define these military facilities.’ I received a letter from (secretary of state, Warren) Christopher to me and to Arafat at the same time, saying that Israel, and Israel alone, will define the ‘military facilities,’ their locations and size. Now they didn’t want to give me this letter, so I refused to ratify the Hebron Accords (of 1997). I stopped the government meeting and I said ‘I wont sign.’ And only when the letter has arrived, during that meeting, to me and to Arafat, I signed the Hebron Accords.
It’s better to give 2% than 100%, and this is the choice we faced. You gave 2% but you stopped the withdrawal, rather than the 100%.
Conclusion: Dezion(az)ification
The above explains why Zionism and Zionists are not just Ziofascism and Ziofascists, but actually Zionazism and Zionazis and why they need to dealt with accordingly — militarily, diplomatically, economically, psychologically, socially, etc.
This reveals another interesting similarity, because just like there was more or less successful “denazification” after World War 2, there is now also a need for “dezion(az)ification” in Israel and elsewhere — for instance to get that insane and evil ideology out of people’s minds or to dismantle the Ziofascist Israelis’ tentacles and power structures across the globe and, eventually, to dismantle insane and evil Ziofascist and Zionazi Israel itself just like Nazi Germany was dismantled and turned into a less insane state.
For more related content, see the Twitter/X hashtag #ZionismIsNazism or watch out for the next article on how Ziofascist Israel Is Nazi Germany 2.0.
